"I actually took my pfsense our from behind pfsense, and used a different firewall to do the PAT. but, still use pfsense for all 'non sipx' stuff."
May I ask what other firewall is that? And how did it do PAT differently? From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Scheidell Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2011 11:28 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Dropped calls On 4/16/11 11:24 AM, Michael Picher wrote: btw, pfsense is a very good firewall product, don't feel like you've wasted any time. there were times with Cisco ASA's I wish they did what I wanted to do too... all products have their nuances. yes, pfsense is a great FW, you just can't use it to PAT (port translate) inbound to port 5060 from voip.ms to sipx on 5080. soon (sipx 4.6?) sipx will be able to take trunking on port 5060, or voip.ms could get off their high horse and let you specify a PORT as well as an ip when doing ip based registration. I actually took my pfsense our from behind pfsense, and used a different firewall to do the PAT. but, still use pfsense for all 'non sipx' stuff. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO o: 561-999-5000 d: 561-948-2259 ISN: 1259*1300 > | SECNAP Network Security Corporation * Best Intrusion Prevention Product, Networks Product Guide * Certified SNORT Integrator * Hot Company Award, World Executive Alliance * Best in Email Security, 2010 Network Products Guide * King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine _____ This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r). For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/ _____
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
