The baseurl was correctly identified at the time I ran the update, and
specifying x86_64 didn't help.
 
I calculated the SHA of the files at the listed in the repo, and the sums
didn't correspond to what was in the repomd.xml - which is why I thought it
to be a problem at the site, and reported it initially.  I checked the x86
repo and the checksums match correctly, so unless the x86_64 is calculated
differently...

I checked again, and  the checksums just don't add up.

Am I doing something wrong???




-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matthew Kitchin
(public/usenet)
Sent: May-13-11 3:08 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] YUM UPDATE Error

I upgraded two 64 bit 4.2.1 machines yesterday, andI had to change the repo
file slightly.
I changed mine to this:
baseurl=http://download.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/4.4.0/CentOS_$releasever/
x86_64/

I had to add the x86_64/ to the end of it. I'm not sure if I should have had
to do that or not, but it didn't work without it, and that is what I
visually saw when I looked at the site in a browser.


On 5/13/2011 2:03 PM, James Walsh wrote:
> No joy on those last commands, except, of course, a broken install.
>
> I'm just going to point this out for the halibut - I'm using the 
> x86_64 release.  It was 4.2.1 upgraded to 4.4.0
>
> My \etc\yum.repos.d\sipxecs.repo:
>
> [sipXecs]
> name=sipXecs software for CentOS $releasever - $basearch 
> baseurl=http://download.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/4.4.0/CentOS_$relea
> sever/
> $basearch
> gpgcheck=0
>
> Next???
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Douglas 
> Hubler
> Sent: May-13-11 2:47 PM
> To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] YUM UPDATE Error
>
> I could not duplicate this. On a system w/4.4.0 installed i ran
>    yum clean all
>    yum erase sipx*
>    yum install sipxecs
>
> Anyone else?
>
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 2:22 PM, James Walsh<[email protected]>  wrote:
>> One of the first things I tried, I'm afraid...
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matthew 
>> Kitchin
>> (public/usenet)
>> Sent: May-13-11 1:54 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] YUM UPDATE Error
>>
>> On 5/13/2011 12:50 PM, James Walsh wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Receiving this error the last couple of days trying to update for 
>>> the various fixes that were released:
>>>
>>> sipXecs/primary                                          |  53 kB
>> 00:00
>>> http://download.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/4.4.0/CentOS_5/x86_64/rep
>>> o
>>> d
>>> ata/pr
>>> imary.xml.gz: [Errno -1] Metadata file does not match checksum
>>>
>>> Any ideas??
>>>
>> try 'yum clean all' and run it again?
>>> James
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sipx-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>> _______________________________________________
>> sipx-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sipx-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>>
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

Reply via email to