On 15 jun 2011, at 09.30, [email protected] wrote: > It is interesting to see that almost nobody is interested in ipv6. > In my opinion it is something that has to happen in the coming years. > It's still a big question how fast the transition is going to be and > more importantly how fast the internal networks of companies are going to > change. > Adrien was brave and just did it, but most startups won't even think about it > (just use 10.x.x.x).
I think the "there is currently no need for IPv6" argument is understandable, but (for what it's worth) I disagree. My guess is that we will see issues with an IPv6 implementation and the sooner we start developing/testing IPv6 support the better the product will be when the need for IPv6 deployment becomes reality. I think that any OTT cloud based VoIP implementation will need IPv6 prior to enterprise environments since this might be an area where it sooner will be tricky for new service providers to get IPv4 addresses. Border devices will most likely traverse and solve a lot of the addressing issues, but to get rid of NAT problems with IPv6 sounds pretty good to me... I fully understand the prioritization of resources, and since I'm not a programmer I'm sad to say that I can't add much value there, but I really think it would be a great feature to start working on native IPv6 support to begin testing for early/future deployments. As far as I know, Asterisk, OpenSIPS, Kamilio and Freeswitch have at least some IPv6 support already? Thanks, //Staffan -- Staffan Kerker mail/sip/xmpp: [email protected] "There is absolutely no money above the 5th fret..." /Donald "Duck" Dunn
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
