Hi Joegen, Thanks for your kind offer. I will first study the Karoo bridge a bit better, before we start tinkering with the scripts. An yes nobody admitted that this is bug. On the other hand the draft that Paul Scheepens dug up indicates that in fact a m= image line should be supported to allow t38 fax functionality to be provided. I did not want this insight to be lost for future development,. that is all... The impact of the issue is quite substantial, the telephony operator that sends the m=image line in its INVITE SDP has about half a million subscribers. And these subscribers cannot reach an extension behind a SipX/UC.
Kind regards, Peter van der Salm Smart Future cv, Buys Ballotstraat 14, 3572 ZR Utrecht, The Netherlands phone: +31 308 793 512 fax: +31 847 156 296 mobile: +31 620 749 471 [email protected] On Jun 30, 2011, at 2:46 , Joegen Baclor wrote: > Nobody admitted this to be a bug in both sipX nor freeswitch so i do not > think a tracker would be appropriate. If you have some time to tinker with > javascripts to modify SDP as it goes back to your provider, you can use Karoo > Bridge. I can help with the script that can modify that SDP. > > On 06/29/2011 04:57 PM, Peter van der Salm wrote: >> >> Paul, >> >> This is indeed a small problem... It seems that m=image needs to be >> supported in the near future anyhow. >> The text in the Draft cannot be missed... >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-salgueiro-mmusic-image-iana-registration-07 >> >> Whether this would solve the disconnect issue needs to be seen, but at least >> the response from Freeswitch would be different than the current >> m=image 0 UDPTL 19 >> Probably changing this to >> m=image 0 UDPTL t38 >> as shown in the example SDP in the Draft would solve the issue. >> >> Thanks a lot to everybody contributed in getting this clear. >> >> Should I create tracker for this issue? >> >> Peter >> >> Smart Future cv, >> Buys Ballotstraat 14, >> 3572 ZR Utrecht, >> The Netherlands >> phone: +31 308 793 512 >> fax: +31 847 156 296 >> mobile: +31 620 749 471 >> [email protected] >> >> >> >> >> On Jun 28, 2011, at 11:57 , Tony Graziano wrote: >> >>> nice to see it being worked on. I like the sample sdp body they provided. >>> >>> I also imagine the current style would have to be supported for some time >>> alongside the new one. >>> >>> I dont think it changes the disconnect issue though. >>> >>> On Jun 28, 2011 3:08 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sipx-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sipx-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
