its either a dns record that should not be there (_sip._tls), your sipdmain ans hostname are the same, you have a device trying to register via tcp or tls that should not be, or you are being attacked by sip vicious scripts. On Jul 14, 2011 9:47 PM, "Keith Laidlaw" <[email protected]> wrote: > I have had this difficulty for many weeks. The only things I have added > from the 4.4 ISO was sendmail-mc and, of course, the latest updates > (last ran yum update last week). I verified that Tony's idea of > restarting registrar and proxy works, but it is simply a kludge. > > > > Any idea where I can look to find out why this is happening? > > > > Keith Laidlaw > > Manager of Engineering > > Dakins Engineering > > 19-3105 Unity Drive > > Mississauga ON L5L 4L2 > > > > 905 814-6024 (w) > > 416 805-6024 (c) > > > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Douglas > Hubler > Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 12:46 PM > To: KeithL > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] phone registrations expired > > > > > > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Tony Graziano > <[email protected]> wrote: > > what I have seen is that the busier the environnment the more frequent > the stops occur. That made me think it was related to the RLS patch. I > tried taking the RLS patch and related components separately from the > build repo, but it became moreso problematic after doing so. > > > > (sample cron entry for daily at 3 hour intervals) > > * 0,3,6,9,12,15,18,21 * * * sipxproc -r SIPRegistrar > * 0,3,6,9,12,15,18,21 * * * sipxproc -r SIPXProxy > > > > I think it stems from a needed patch to RLS, but I might be wrong. I > have querid this already on the sipx-dev list and am hoping to see some > activity on it. If you are also having this issue on 4.4.0 (anyone) it > would help to know. I am not sure whether it is related to XX-9634 or > not. > > > > Patch for RLS can't possibly effect this in a negative way, fix was > isolated to these 2 files. > > > > M sipXrls/src/ResourceListFileReader.cpp > > M sipXrls/src/ResourceListSet.cpp > > > > It could affect it in a positive way in that devices won't be blasting > SUBSCRIBEs to RLS because they are not getting a response. > > > > I do think Mark should take Tony's advice on looking into sipvicious > attacks, they seem to be more common then uncommon. > > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
