We did receive more information and the person is aware that there are tariffs, laws to be followed etc. Based on what I was being told here, it certainly could have been a scam but now appears to be legit.
I just wish I knew more about doing this so that I could give them a proper quote. On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 08:26:45 +0100, shouldbe q931 wrote: > On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 12:57 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Thought I sent this privately. As always doing too many things at once. >> >> We don't know much else at this time, only that someone wants to know if >> this is something we could do so thought I would at least do a little >> preliminary research. Good to know that it could be a phone scam, >> definitely not something we're interested in getting involved with. >> >> I appreciate the input on this, very much. >> >> Mike >> >> >> On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 18:15:07 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote: >>> be careful over yonder. there are pretty strict laws in some >>> localities to restrict voip. People go to jail for not using the state >>> sponsored telco and side stepping toll fees... "crossing an operator" >>> might simply mean having a telco tattle on you because you sidestepped >>> their revenue stream also... >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 5:17 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I thought I would contact you direct on this at this point because >>>> it's >>>> kind of getting away from sipx. >>>> >>>> >>>>> The implementation shouldn't be difficult. You have to really be >>>>> sure >>>>> what you are getting into on this, if the customer is short on >>>>> detail on >>>>> use I'd be wary, you probably don't want to be party to crossing an >>>>> operator. If you are unsure of intent a few well worked questions >>>>> might >>>>> save you a real headache. >>>>> >>>> Do you mean this in terms of legalities or something else? >>>> What do you mean by 'crossing an operator'? >>>> >>>> Mike >>>> > > Many countries have quite strict laws about about international call > origination and termination. If you are bypassing "their" state > telephone company, they lose the revenue stream and the ability to > "intercept". > > I have previously setup several systems that link remote offices back > to the UK, but the remote site system have not been allowed to connect > to their "local" PSTN. I would presume that most countries would see > connecting to a GSM network the same as connecting to a PSTN network. _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
