why exactly is this discussion on-list?
other than a very brief discussion of ham gateway capabilities, it is really not list-worthy. On Aug 7, 2011 6:46 PM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > I certainly appreciate the offer. > > I'm not sure what we'll do yet, it's a little out of our league. It sounds like something we could do but it also sounds like there would be a learning curve which would prevent us from giving proper estimates. To top it all off, we're already over taxed on other things so not even sure how we will deal with this at the moment. > > > > On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 13:23:37 -0400, Online Systems wrote: >> Hello, >> >> It can be little difficult to wrap your head around the concept. If >> you'd like I can fire up a gateway and if you have a running SIPx >> install that matches what you would propose to the prospect we can get >> the gateway speaking to SIPx and you can run some test calls through the >> unit to get an idea of call quality. I am partial to TMO, so if you have >> TMO that would be great, otherwise I have some ATT SIMs laying around >> that I should be able to find. I think it would be a good test to call >> to/from a cellphone to SIPx with a gateway in the middle. I'd recommend >> using something like G.729, since bandwidth can get pretty expensive >> over in Africa. >> >> The only thing I'd ask in return is that I get a documented procedure of >> what is done on the your side to configure SIPx. Thanks. >> >> >> On 8/5/2011 12:53 PM, [email protected] wrote: >>> We did receive more information and the person is aware that there are >>> tariffs, laws to be followed etc. >>> Based on what I was being told here, it certainly could have been a scam >>> but now appears to be legit. >>> >>> I just wish I knew more about doing this so that I could give them a >>> proper quote. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 08:26:45 +0100, shouldbe q931 wrote: >>>> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 12:57 AM, [email protected]<[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Thought I sent this privately. As always doing too many things at >>>>> once. >>>>> >>>>> We don't know much else at this time, only that someone wants to know >>>>> if >>>>> this is something we could do so thought I would at least do a little >>>>> preliminary research. Good to know that it could be a phone scam, >>>>> definitely not something we're interested in getting involved with. >>>>> >>>>> I appreciate the input on this, very much. >>>>> >>>>> Mike >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 18:15:07 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote: >>>>>> be careful over yonder. there are pretty strict laws in some >>>>>> localities to restrict voip. People go to jail for not using the >>>>>> state >>>>>> sponsored telco and side stepping toll fees... "crossing an >>>>>> operator" >>>>>> might simply mean having a telco tattle on you because you >>>>>> sidestepped >>>>>> their revenue stream also... >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 5:17 PM, [email protected]<[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I thought I would contact you direct on this at this point because >>>>>>> it's >>>>>>> kind of getting away from sipx. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The implementation shouldn't be difficult. You have to really be >>>>>>>> sure >>>>>>>> what you are getting into on this, if the customer is short on >>>>>>>> detail on >>>>>>>> use I'd be wary, you probably don't want to be party to >>>>>>>> crossing an >>>>>>>> operator. If you are unsure of intent a few well worked >>>>>>>> questions >>>>>>>> might >>>>>>>> save you a real headache. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do you mean this in terms of legalities or something else? >>>>>>> What do you mean by 'crossing an operator'? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Mike >>>>>>> >>>> Many countries have quite strict laws about about international call >>>> origination and termination. If you are bypassing "their" state >>>> telephone company, they lose the revenue stream and the ability to >>>> "intercept". >>>> >>>> I have previously setup several systems that link remote offices back >>>> to the UK, but the remote site system have not been allowed to connect >>>> to their "local" PSTN. I would presume that most countries would see >>>> connecting to a GSM network the same as connecting to a PSTN network. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sipx-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> sipx-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
