I understand. We have very power server 2 CPU xeon 5700 series and 192 GB memory.
Nikolay Subbotkin Senior System Administrator ------------------------------------ Publishers "Prosveshchenye" tel: +7 495 789 30 40 ext. 3235 From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Picher Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:19 PM To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Memory and java No, I don't think your memory / processor problem either. I'm just letting you know that you may encounter problems in the future as you scale. Thanks, Mike On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Subbotkin, Nikolay <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Thanx, Mike I think not problem in virtualization technology, now very fine work, except memory. Load in my system little and we progress to 200-300 users may be 3-4 month increase, see. I migrate with CS1000E. I'm testing this configuration in hardware server result was the same. Hardware Dell m600 blade server 2 CPU and 32GB memory. I do not think will problem is vmware. Install and test rpm today. I will write about the results. If I'm wrong I write in English, correct me. Thanx. Nikolay Subbotkin Senior System Administrator ------------------------------------ Publishers "Prosveshchenye" tel: +7 495 789 30 40<tel:%2B7%20495%20789%2030%2040> ext. 3235 From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Michael Picher Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 4:43 PM To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Memory and java There are some fixes coming in the most current updates that address some memory leaks that were occurring. The updates aren't in the normal 4.4.0 rpm path but if you want to test you can direct your repo file to: http://download.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/4.4.0.bak/CentOS_5/x86_64/ The rpm's will probably get moved over some time this week. In general what you are doing (running sipXecs in a virtual) may cause audio problems at large user levels with media services and sip trunks on the server. Where that level is, we're not sure but I'm sure it will be different for different virtualization technologies. Thanks, Mike On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Matthew Kitchin (usenet/public) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Are you using the built in backup utility? -----Original Message----- From: "Subbotkin, Nikolay" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sender: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 16:22:24 To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Reply-To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [sipx-users] Memory and java _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ -- Michael Picher eZuce Director of Technical Services O.978-296-1005 X2015<tel:978-296-1005%20X2015> M.207-956-0262<tel:207-956-0262> @mpicher <http://twitter.com/mpicher> www.ezuce.com<http://www.ezuce.com> _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ -- Michael Picher eZuce Director of Technical Services O.978-296-1005 X2015 M.207-956-0262 @mpicher <http://twitter.com/mpicher> www.ezuce.com<http://www.ezuce.com>
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
