it will take me a little time to do this again. my point is that even if it is a lost carrier freeswitch sends the okay confirmation to the sender for a successfully received fax. then it throws it away.
if it is better to long beach hear differently that's 1 thing, but I am simply trying to avoid paper jams and other things preventing a fax to come through. On Aug 29, 2011 11:36 AM, "George Niculae" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Tony Graziano > <[email protected]> wrote: >> OK, I will do that and supply it. >> > > Thanks, I'm pretty sure that is 26 Carrier lost during fax receive - > from the logs attached to JIRA: > > [m [33m2011-07-08 17:42:51.493928 [DEBUG] mod_spandsp_fax.c:333 > ============================================================================== > [m [33m2011-07-08 17:42:51.493928 [DEBUG] mod_spandsp_fax.c:345 Fax > processing not successful - result (26) Carrier lost during fax > receive. > [m [33m2011-07-08 17:42:51.493928 [DEBUG] mod_spandsp_fax.c:350 > Remote station id: FAX > [m [33m2011-07-08 17:42:51.493928 [DEBUG] mod_spandsp_fax.c:351 Local > station id: SpanDSP Fax Ident > [m [33m2011-07-08 17:42:51.493928 [DEBUG] mod_spandsp_fax.c:352 Pages > transferred: 1 > [m [33m2011-07-08 17:42:51.493928 [DEBUG] mod_spandsp_fax.c:354 Total > fax pages: 1 > [m [33m2011-07-08 17:42:51.493928 [DEBUG] mod_spandsp_fax.c:355 Image > resolution: 8031x7700 > [m [33m2011-07-08 17:42:51.493928 [DEBUG] mod_spandsp_fax.c:356 > Transfer Rate: 14400 > [m [33m2011-07-08 17:42:51.493928 [DEBUG] mod_spandsp_fax.c:358 ECM > status on > [m [33m2011-07-08 17:42:51.493928 [DEBUG] mod_spandsp_fax.c:359 > remote country: > [m [33m2011-07-08 17:42:51.493928 [DEBUG] mod_spandsp_fax.c:360 > remote vendor: > [m [33m2011-07-08 17:42:51.493928 [DEBUG] mod_spandsp_fax.c:361 > remote model: > [m [33m2011-07-08 17:42:51.493928 [DEBUG] mod_spandsp_fax.c:363 > ============================================================================== > > Though code 26 is not reflected in FS wiki page > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Variable_fax_result_code but it could > be due to FS wiki not up to date. When you confirm this is the case > I'll go back to FS code / FS user list and clarify this > > George > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
