http://download.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs-stage/
On Sep 6, 2011 2:30 PM, "Tony Graziano" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> the update code is available. it is probably something like trying to
switch
> back to g 711 before actually negociating the hang up. so just do the
update
> already.
> On Sep 6, 2011 2:28 PM, "McIlvin, Don" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>> Having a problem where FAX comes inbound via T.38 ITSP DID. From the
>> sender end it went fine. On receive end, nothing.
>>
>> Running 4.4 Update #9
>>
>> I am aware that once Jira XX-9760 gets included in an update, it may
>> improve or resolve the issue - in terms of getting the fax content.
>>
>>
>>
>> But what I would like to do is get more detail on what it is doing
>> specifically when it gets the 481 err (in switch_ivr.c).
>>
>> So, the question is How does one get more detail ([DEBUG] level) in the
>> freeswitch.log?
>>
>>>From freeswitch.log
>>
>> 2011-09-02 13:18:50.689136 [NOTICE] switch_ivr_originate.c:3363 Channel
>> [sofia/call.mydomain.com/[email protected]:5060
>> <http://10.128.16.16:5060> ] has been answered
>>
>> 2011-09-02 13:19:33.981742 [ERR] switch_ivr.c:481 Invalid Command!
>>
>> 2011-09-02 13:19:34.224665 [NOTICE] mod_dptools.c:915 Hangup
>> sofia/call.mydomain.com/[email protected] <http://10.16.140.10>
>> [CS_EXECUTE] [NORMAL_CLEARING]
>>
>>
>>
>> don
>>
>>
>>
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tony
>> Graziano
>> Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2011 7:17 AM
>> To: Sipx-users list
>> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Fax failure(s) and one method to avoid them.
>>
>>
>>
>> http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-9760
>>
>>
>>
>> Unless I hear any reasoning from anyone that this is a not preferred
>> method, I will ask for this to be marked as resolved and have this
>> included in whatever release it can make it into.
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Tony Graziano
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> After a lengthy discussion between myself and an ezuce engineer, I
>> altered come java code to "make" any received fax "work" with another
>> provider I had been testing with.
>>
>>
>>
>> Strangely I had seen internal receive errors that were FS related even
>> after the sender was sent an indication the fax was successful. So I set
>> off to find out where this was. With a little guidance from Cristi I was
>> able to findthe java code which I altered and sent back to him and he
>> provided it to me in a jar file, which I replaced in a working system
>> 4.4 (patch 10) system.
>>
>>
>>
>> What I now have as a default behavior is the following:
>>
>>
>>
>> Call the fax extension and hangup (no negotiation or data transfer). You
>> will mow get an email that says "Your (0) page fax was received" when a
>> fax comes in. The same is also true when a 5 of 6 page fax comes in, it
>> will "send" whatever it receives, and indicate the number of pages
>> received. My intent in this is to simply "send whatever we receive". If
>> the sender has a paper jam, we shouldnt throw away the first 24 pages
>> and try to be more "fax machine like".
>>
>>
>>
>> Does anyone disagree with this approach before I ask to mark the issue
>> resolved and make the necessary commits?
>>
>>
>>
>> Also, a big thanks to Cristi for letting me bug him!!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ======================
>> Tony Graziano, Manager
>> Telephone: 434.984.8430
>> sip: [email protected]
>> Fax: 434.465.6833
>>
>> Email: [email protected]
>>
>> LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
>> Telephone: 434.984.8426
>> sip: [email protected]
>>
>> Helpdesk Contract Customers:
>> http://support.myitdepartment.net
>>
>>
>>
>> Blog:
>>
>> http://blog.myitdepartment.net
>>
>>
>>
>> Linked-In Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4
>>
>>
>>
>> Ask about our Internet faxservices!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ======================
>> Tony Graziano, Manager
>> Telephone: 434.984.8430
>> sip: [email protected]
>> Fax: 434.465.6833
>>
>> Email: [email protected]
>>
>> LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
>> Telephone: 434.984.8426
>> sip: [email protected]
>>
>> Helpdesk Contract Customers:
>> http://support.myitdepartment.net
>>
>>
>>
>> Blog:
>>
>> http://blog.myitdepartment.net
>>
>>
>>
>> Linked-In Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4
>>
>>
>>
>> Ask about our Internet faxservices!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "The information in this electronic mail message is the sender's
> confidential business and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely
> for the addressee(s). Access to this internet electronic mail message by
> anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any
> disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be
taken
> in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful."
>> "The sender believes that this E-mail and any attachments were free of
any
> virus, worm, Trojan horse, and/or malicious code when sent. This message
and
> its attachments could have been infected during transmission. By reading
the
> message and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts full
> responsibility for taking protective and remedial action about viruses and
> other defects. The sender's employer is not liable for any loss or damage
> arising in any way from this message or its attachments."
>> "In connection with representing sellers and/or buyers in real estate
> transactions, Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage real estate sales
> associates have absolutely no authority to create binding contractual
> obligations on behalf of a seller or on behalf of a buyer via any written
or
> verbal communications including, but not limited to email communications."
> [v1.0.07.109]
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

Reply via email to