Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Organization: SipXecs Forum In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <63898> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
voip.ms seems fine. they claim it can take up to three weeks to port a number. business did: Two choices: #1 pay $6.95 a month, you get two call paths and 3500 min inbound. or, pay .99/month, you get 20 call paths, and pay for inbound. (both pay for outbound). and, for toll free outbound, you can choose free, or pay for it (quality choice) I do find their rates and quality good. do your ping times on their servers. the closest one might not be geographically closest. also, their inbound toll free rates are great, and quality is great. CNAME lookup isn't the best, they use a cheap provider, and do charge 1/8 of a cent per lookup. their 'user/auth' sometimes fails, so, select ip based. (with ip based, you MUST PORT NAT THEIR INBOUND 5060 TO SIPX 5080) tony: did voip.ms ever give us the option of specifying port? (which I assume would muck up their QOS stuff) pps, skype for business gateway. I agree, their sip trunks are crap, along with the 'buckets' you need to constantly fill with cash. BUT, based on ALL the problems sipx has with gremlins in firewalls, natting, 3g, 4g, and call quality over cell phones, running skype on the cell phone to talk to a office sip box would be great. -- -- Michael Scheidell, CTO SECNAP Network Security Corp _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
