On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:30:39 -0500, Tony Graziano wrote: > I did this a few days ago but was running stable code to teat against.
I guess at this point, I have nothing to lose but time since the data will be backed up. Thanks again for the input. Mike > On Jan 20, 2012 6:54 PM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I've only done one update, and it went fine, but I took the >> whole repo and was not in a production environment. you should remove >> sipxvir and reinstall from the version you were using (assuming >> stable). >> > When you did this and it worked, I'm assuming the server was fully updated > first? > > I'm thinking I could do a backup, then do the update, if it goes well, > fine. If not, it would not take that long to rebuild it, update it then > restore it. > > >> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 6:43 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Often, there's more to it than just updating an rpm and I wasn't >>> completely sure of which to update. I didn't want to update the entire >>> server if I didn't have to. Thanks for the additional info. >>> >>> I've gone ahead and done the update. Faxes were coming in before the >>> update but now sipx seems to answer the call then dead air. >>> Email notices also stop when the new rpm is updated. Putting it back to >>> the old one gets everything working again. >>> >>> Darn, I so badly needed this. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:51:07 -0500, Tony Graziano wrote: >>>> well you would have to: >>>> >>>> service sipxecs stop >>>> >>>> manually install THAT rpm (sipxivr) from sipx-stage, start sipxecs >>>> services and test. If something was wrong you would need to manually >>>> uninstall sipxivr amd reinstall the original rpm (version) you have. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 4:25 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> The server is a 4.4.0, installed using RPM. I don't have a test >>>>> server >>>>> handy and I badly need this right now in order to complete some >>>>> network >>>>> changes. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:15:05 -0500, Tony Graziano wrote: >>>>>> you should do this in a test environment... >>>>>> >>>>>> use the sipx-stage repo and do a yum update... >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 4:05 PM, [email protected] >>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:41:13 -0500, Tony Graziano wrote: >>>>>>>> as said before on_this_list_this_week, it is available in >>>>>>>> sipxecs-stage for anyone who wants to test it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://download.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs-stage/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> I do monitor this list but since I'm doing this part time, I >>>>>>> don't >>>>>>> often >>>>>>> read all of the posts and search instead. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for the lead but that doesn't really answer anything. >>>>>>> Which rpm would I install onto my current 4.4.0 setup to get >>>>>>> this >>>>>>> functionality on? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> sipx-users mailing list >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> sipx-users mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sipx-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
