I think for a production environment it's much easier to run 4.4 from ISO 
(thus Centos 5) and upgrade by 
-backup 
-ISO install of 4.6
-restore

BTW: NOT 4.5, all odd releases are development releases

Douglas Hubler <[email protected]> wrote on 08-02-2012 19:38:03:
> 
>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Becker, Jesse <[email protected]> 
wrote:
>>  Thank you for your reply. I was not planning on doing an in place 
>> upgrade from Centos5 to 6. i was wondering if CentOS 6 could be 
>> installed on the new servers and then install SipX 4.4 from RPM and 
>> restore the configuration. The second part of that questions was if 
>> one was on CentOS 6 and SipX 4.4, would they be able to in place 
>> upgrade to 4.5.  I am trying to determine if it is worth getting 4.4
>> to run on CentOS 6 now or if we should just stick with CentOS 5 and 
SipX 4.4.
>> 
> That would be great if you could get 4.4 to compile on centos 6.  i 
> recall a few seeing patches to freeswitch related to centos 6. 
> sipxecs 4.4 already compiled on fedora 12, so the switch to centos 6
> was pretty non eventful.  we'd want only the patches to freeswitch 
> for centos 6, not all patches in between because it would risk 
> destablizing freeswitch in 4.4
> 
> with mock, you need to copy ./mak/mock/centos-6* files from master.
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

Reply via email to