I think you need to understand you might be treading new ground with the
platform. You really should provide a pcap and make sure the provider has
Nat turned off.
On Feb 29, 2012 8:07 AM, "Steve" <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Todd has been extremely helpful to me over the last couple of weeks. I am
> not on the broadvox legacy platform. I have gotten this to work fully but
> using a checkpoint utm edge firewall, so I know it works. I'm specifically
> running into issues with pfsense and rather just chocking it up and moving
> forward with the checkpoint device, I'm trying to figure out why it doesn't
> work with pfsense.
>
> I suspect there is something with this specific combination (broadvox new
> platform, sipx, pfsense) which is why I'm hoping to find someone that's
> running a similar config.
>
>
>  Thanks,
> Steve
> Appraisal Host Software
> 781-214-6250
>
> On 2/29/2012 7:50 AM, Tony Graziano wrote:
>
> Todd is the broadvox guru. Specifically eat you need to be on their legacy
> platform.
>
> You could always provide a packet capture from the firewall.
> On Feb 29, 2012 7:35 AM, "Steve" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>  Thanks.. I have no issue spending money or time figuring this out
>> however, I've yet to find anyone that's gotten this to work with a pfsense
>> firewall and broadvox. I'm open to using another open source fw as well.
>>
>> So, if there is anyone on the list that has gotten this to work (sipx,
>> pfsense fw and broadvox) I'd like to hear from you. Specifically, my issue
>> is inbound calling. Outbound works fine.
>>
>> Steve
>>
>>
>> On 02/29/2012 07:22 AM, Michael Picher wrote:
>>
>> Server can only have one NIC so this is a fail...
>>
>>  What you're trying to do here really isn't that hard...
>>
>>  If you can't make it work, I'd suggest spending more time to learn
>> about this stuff and make sure you have the proper hardware.  Or seek help
>> from somebody who can just set it up for you and make it work.
>>
>>  Both of which may involve some $...  But, there are only 2 ways to do
>> things.
>>
>>  Mike
>>
>>
>>  On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Steve <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> This probably isn't specifically a sipx architecture question..
>>>
>>> I've been having some issues with NAT, I've been able to get it to work
>>> with one firewall (that's underpowered) but not pfsense.  I've even gone
>>> so far as to start from scratch going to v1x of pfsense and following
>>> Tony's postings and importing pieces of Tony's sample config with no
>>> success. I've even tried IPCOP with same results.
>>>
>>> So, I've decided to abandon the whole NAT thing and just move the server
>>> to the DMZ.  So my question is this, as I have 2 NIC's in my sipx server
>>> can I just add the second IP to the server (for the DMZ public address)
>>> and then also have the server plugged into the existing phone (non
>>> routable) network?
>>>
>>> Essentially, my phones (all IP) would be completely segregated with no
>>> access to the Internet or other networks. The sipx server would have a
>>> connection on that network as they would obviously need to communicate
>>> with the sipx server.
>>>
>>> Are there any issues with this config? Do the phones need any other
>>> connectivity other than the sipx server, NTP for example?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Steve
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sipx-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  --
>> Michael Picher, Director of Technical Services
>> eZuce, Inc.
>>
>> 300 Brickstone Square
>>
>> Suite 201
>>
>> Andover, MA. 01810
>>  O.978-296-1005 X2015
>> M.207-956-0262
>> @mpicher <http://twitter.com/mpicher>
>> www.ezuce.com
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Hope to see you at the sipX CoLab! http://www.sipfoundry.org/sipx-colab
>> A gathering for - open source users, eZuce customers & eZuce partners
>> Get the inside track on 4.6 and a glimpse at the future of sipXecs!
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sipx-users mailing [email protected]
>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sipx-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>>
>
> LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
> Telephone: 434.984.8426
> sip: [email protected].**net<[email protected]>
>
>  Helpdesk Customers: 
> http://myhelp.myitdepartment.**net<http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net>
> Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>

-- 
LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
Telephone: 434.984.8426
sip: [email protected]

Helpdesk Customers: http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net
Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net

<<logosmallwhite.jpg>>

_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

Reply via email to