We evaluated the Audio Codes MSBG and two other SBC vendor products
(InGate and Acme Packet), decided on another vendor so the AC Eval Unit
(box) got returned. I haven't been logged in since last August.
The MSBG adds a second config file for the SBC functions that sipXecs
does not have. So all of the SBC settings were manual.
I remember a few things..
- We had to tell it the DNS records for proxy and reg access was an SRV
record, by default it assumed they were A records.
- I did find a note of interest; One of the problems fixed by a
parameter change was 'BrokenConnectionEventTimeout = 1000'.
> The default of '100' was way too low.
We stopped the eval on it once we determined our SBC requirements
exceeded what the software was designed to handle. We did have some
atypical requirements. But as far as we got it seemed to be a decent SBC
for the right fit.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dave May
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 11:31 AM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Mediant 1000 MSBG
Thanks for the response, Don.
Do you have any specific guidance on what kinds of tweaking you had to
perform, or what functional areas gave you the most trouble? Was your
testing eventually successful?
My starting point on this is to compare a base .ini file downloaded from
the MSBG gateway, with a base .ini file generated by Sipxecs for the
Mediant 1000 model. My hope is that this provides enough to get me
going in the right direction, but any pointers would be appreciated.
Dave.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of McIlvin,
Don
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 11:13 AM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Mediant 1000 MSBG
I evaluated this last summer. We tested config as
SipX-LAN-MSBG-Internet-ITSP.
6.0 was the first version w/SBC functionality. 6.2 fixed problems we
encountered with 6.0. Haven't tested 6.4.
Use 'unmanaged'. There will be a lot of parameter tweaking from defaults
so I suggest you get used to the web admin interface.
don
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dave May
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 10:04 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [sipx-users] Mediant 1000 MSBG
Is anybody using the Mediant 1000 MSBG with Sipxecs or openUC as a
Managed Gateway?
There is not an exact match for this particular model, what is the
recommendation for setting one of these guys up under Sipxecs/openUC?
Are there any benefits to managed vs unmanaged, other than generating
the configuration file for you?
Also, there are also no enums present for newer versions of the
AudioCodes firmware (specifically 6.2 and 6.4). Has anybody tested with
these versions, and are there any known benefits to either sticking with
6.0 or using the latest version of either 6.2 or 6.4?
Thanks,
Dave.
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
"The information in this electronic mail message is the sender's
confidential business and may be legally privileged. It is intended
solely for the addressee(s). Access to this internet electronic mail
message by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended
recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or
omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be
unlawful."
"The sender believes that this E-mail and any attachments were free of
any virus, worm, Trojan horse, and/or malicious code when sent. This
message and its attachments could have been infected during
transmission. By reading the message and opening any attachments, the
recipient accepts full responsibility for taking protective and remedial
action about viruses and other defects. The sender's employer is not
liable for any loss or damage arising in any way from this message or
its attachments."
"In connection with representing sellers and/or buyers in real estate
transactions, Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage real estate sales
associates have absolutely no authority to create binding contractual
obligations on behalf of a seller or on behalf of a buyer via any
written or verbal communications including, but not limited to email
communications." [v1.0.07.109]
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
