realize with RAM, once you start using swap performance degrades quite a bit. So SWAP might be affecting the CPU issue in an adverse way. Are you using any swap? Ideally you should have enough ram to prevent using swap.
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Kurt Albershardt <[email protected]> wrote: > Allocated 2 gbytes RAM and 4 gbytes of swap to the VM. Was using 32% of > memory yesterday. Left it running all night and it's at 40% according to > Proxmox. > > Top is still looking about the same: > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND > 1666 sipx 20 0 2505m 611m 13m S 230.4 29.9 2184:51 java > > > > > On Jul 8, 2012, at 19:44 , Tony Graziano wrote: > > How much ram did you allot? > > On Jul 8, 2012 6:16 PM, "Kurt Albershardt" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Jul 8, 2012, at 16:12 , Kurt Albershardt wrote: >> >> > after a restart Java is munching ~95-99% of all available CPUs again. >> >> FYI -- I allocated another proc to the VM, and CPU jumped from 197% (2 >> CPUs) to 231% (3 CPUs.) > > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 sip: [email protected] Fax: 434.465.6833 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Linked-In Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4 Ask about our Internet Fax services! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Using or developing for sipXecs from SIPFoundry? Ask me about sipX-CoLab 2013! -- LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 sip: [email protected] Helpdesk Customers: http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
