No swap in use at all -- not much RAM either, just CPU.
On Jul 9, 2012, at 9:46 , Tony Graziano wrote: > realize with RAM, once you start using swap performance degrades quite > a bit. So SWAP might be affecting the CPU issue in an adverse way. Are > you using any swap? Ideally you should have enough ram to prevent > using swap. > > On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Kurt Albershardt <[email protected]> wrote: >> Allocated 2 gbytes RAM and 4 gbytes of swap to the VM. Was using 32% of >> memory yesterday. Left it running all night and it's at 40% according to >> Proxmox. >> >> Top is still looking about the same: >> >> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND >> 1666 sipx 20 0 2505m 611m 13m S 230.4 29.9 2184:51 java >> >> >> >> >> On Jul 8, 2012, at 19:44 , Tony Graziano wrote: >> >> How much ram did you allot? >> >> On Jul 8, 2012 6:16 PM, "Kurt Albershardt" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Jul 8, 2012, at 16:12 , Kurt Albershardt wrote: >>> >>>> after a restart Java is munching ~95-99% of all available CPUs again. >>> >>> FYI -- I allocated another proc to the VM, and CPU jumped from 197% (2 >>> CPUs) to 231% (3 CPUs.) _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
