Diffs are below -- first two are expected but don't know much about the MOH URI.
On Jul 30, 2012, at 13:45 , Tony Graziano wrote: > I don't use snom's but if you could compare the two sipx generated config > files to see what is different between them, if anything, it would be worth > the look. > > On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Kurt Albershardt <[email protected]> wrote: > Still no luck getting these to register with 4.6 > > Phones are showing "network failure" in the registration status and seeing > timeouts reaching the sipx box. > > Network config (including DNS) in phones is the same as when they pull > configs from 4.4 (seen via phone HTTP interface in both cases.) > > > > On Jul 15, 2012, at 23:27 , Kurt Albershardt wrote: > >> On Jul 15, 2012, at 17:12 , Tony Graziano wrote: >>> I think the thing you are leaving out is the phone config generated by sipx >>> can load a different DNS setting than what you intended, which is why I >>> suggested this deployment option to avoid a conflicting configuration on >>> the UA itself. >>> >> OK, that helps. >> >> I'll take another a look at the Snom XML configs. When I diffed them on >> Friday I found only these differences: >> >> <ntp_server perm="R"></ntp_server> <ntp_server >> perm="R">pool.ntp.org</ntp_server> >> >> <user_pass idx="1" perm="R">123456789012</user_pass> <user_pass >> idx="1" perm="R">12355678</user_pass> >> >> <user_moh idx="1" perm="R">sip:[email protected]</user_moh> >> <user_moh idx="1" perm="R">sip:[email protected]</user_moh>
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
