Hey Adam, I like it - looks clean and loads quickly. I like the logos that you and Andrew produced as well.
Ross On 10 September 2012 19:47, Adam Estrada <estrada.a...@gmail.com> wrote: > What about the template? I like the Twitter Bootstrap UI simply because of > all the bells and whistles is already has baked in to it. What are your > thoughts on this, Ross? > > a > > On Sep 10, 2012, at 2:34 PM, Ross Laidlaw wrote: > >> Would it be useful to move the CMS files from the site folder to a new >> folder? In hindsight, I probably should have proposed this to begin >> with as it would help to clarify the separation between the original >> site and CMS site. For example, we could move site/branches and >> site/trunk to new folder 'cms' (i.e. to become cms/branches and >> cms/trunk). >> >> Ross >> >> >> >> On 10 Sep 2012, at 17:53, Ross Laidlaw <rlaidlaw.o...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Chris & Martin, >>> >>> The CMS staging area was set up for the SIS project to experiment >>> with. It was set up by Joe Schaefer responding to my request on >>> INFRA-5015 (also noted on SIS-31). The address for the staging area >>> is: http://sis.staging.apache.org/sis/ and the files are stored in: >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/sis/site/trunk. For my >>> part, I added the site/trunk and site/branch folders to conform to the >>> required template for CMS (http://www.apache.org/dev/cms.html#layout). >>> >>> This experimental area hasn't been integrated yet with SIS (e.g. build >>> process). One approach might be to experiment with it (site design, >>> etc) until we're happy with the new site and then we can integrate it >>> with the SIS project. Meanwhile the original site should still be >>> there as before. It is my understanding that the existing SIS site >>> and pom files (located at: >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/sis/site - i.e. the pom.xml >>> and src directory) weren't altered in any way to set up the CMS >>> staging area. So everything should still be the same as before in >>> that regard. >>> >>> Ross >>> >>> >>> >>> On 10 Sep 2012, at 15:50, "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" >>> <chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Martin, >>>> >>>> Since Ross Laidlaw moved us to the Apache CMS some of this information >>>> might have changed. >>>> Ross, can you comment? As for having the right permission to deploy the >>>> snapshots reports, you should >>>> have sufficient karma to deploy them once we figure out how :) >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Chris >>>> >>>> On Sep 10, 2012, at 4:19 AM, Martin Desruisseaux wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello all >>>>> >>>>> We are in a state where we could deploy the Maven reports (Javadoc, >>>>> etc.). However I don't see any <site> section in the >>>>> <distributionManagement> section of the pom.xml. Does anyone know where >>>>> the Maven reports are expected to be deployed for snapshots of Apache >>>>> projects? I presume that this is a different place than the one for >>>>> Apache releases? And who have the credential for deploying the snapshots >>>>> reports? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Martin >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. >>>> Senior Computer Scientist >>>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA >>>> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 >>>> Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov >>>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ >>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department >>>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA >>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> >
