What about the template? I like the Twitter Bootstrap UI simply because of all 
the bells and whistles is already has baked in to it. What are your thoughts on 
this, Ross?

a

On Sep 10, 2012, at 2:34 PM, Ross Laidlaw wrote:

> Would it be useful to move the CMS files from the site folder to a new
> folder?  In hindsight, I probably should have proposed this to begin
> with as it would help to clarify the separation between the original
> site and CMS site.  For example, we could move site/branches and
> site/trunk to new folder 'cms' (i.e. to become cms/branches and
> cms/trunk).
> 
> Ross
> 
> 
> 
> On 10 Sep 2012, at 17:53, Ross Laidlaw <rlaidlaw.o...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Chris & Martin,
>> 
>> The CMS staging area was set up for the SIS project to experiment
>> with.  It was set up by Joe Schaefer responding to my request on
>> INFRA-5015 (also noted on SIS-31).  The address for the staging area
>> is: http://sis.staging.apache.org/sis/ and the files are stored in:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/sis/site/trunk.  For my
>> part, I added the site/trunk and site/branch folders to conform to the
>> required template for CMS (http://www.apache.org/dev/cms.html#layout).
>> 
>> This experimental area hasn't been integrated yet with SIS (e.g. build
>> process).  One approach might be to experiment with it (site design,
>> etc) until we're happy with the new site and then we can integrate it
>> with the SIS project.  Meanwhile the original site should still be
>> there as before.  It is my understanding that the existing SIS site
>> and pom files (located at:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/sis/site - i.e. the pom.xml
>> and src directory) weren't altered in any way to set up the CMS
>> staging area.  So everything should still be the same as before in
>> that regard.
>> 
>> Ross
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 10 Sep 2012, at 15:50, "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)"
>> <chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Martin,
>>> 
>>> Since Ross Laidlaw moved us to the Apache CMS some of this information 
>>> might have changed.
>>> Ross, can you comment? As for having the right permission to deploy the 
>>> snapshots reports, you should
>>> have sufficient karma to deploy them once we figure out how :)
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Chris
>>> 
>>> On Sep 10, 2012, at 4:19 AM, Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hello all
>>>> 
>>>> We are in a state where we could deploy the Maven reports (Javadoc, etc.). 
>>>> However I don't see any <site> section in the <distributionManagement> 
>>>> section of the pom.xml. Does anyone know where the Maven reports are 
>>>> expected to be deployed for snapshots of Apache projects? I presume that 
>>>> this is a different place than the one for Apache releases? And who have 
>>>> the credential for deploying the snapshots reports?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> 
>>>>    Martin
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>>> Senior Computer Scientist
>>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>>> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
>>> Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
>>> WWW:   http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
>>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 

Reply via email to