Le 10/09/12 23:48, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) a écrit :
I don't have any objection, but I think we should check with Kevan Miller on the SIS project -- Kevan is usually pretty familiar with the licensing aspect of this stuff. Kevan?
Actually I don't think that this information binds us to any licensing. I see it more as a documentation thing, i.e. advising that we try to implement some specification...
On Sep 10, 2012, at 3:37 AM, Martin Desruisseaux wrote:META-INF/MANIFEST files have two kind of entries (among others): * Specification title, version and vendor * Implementation title, version and vendor The default Apache configuration sets those two kind of entries to the same values, which is inferred from the Apache project name and version. This is fine for the implementation entries. However I suggest to set the specification entries to the following, if SIS is aimed to be the reference implementation of GeoAPI interfaces: <Specification-Title>GeoAPI</Specification-Title> <Specification-Version>${geoapi.version}</Specification-Version> <Specification-Vendor>Open Geospatial Consortium</Specification-Vendor> Any objection?
