>From sdague Wed Jun 5 13:53:09 2002
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by localhost.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 465D4CE82
for <sdague@localhost>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 13:53:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.dague.net [64.26.55.212]
by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.0)
for sdague@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 05 Jun 2002 13:53:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
[216.136.171.252])
by garcia.siteprotect.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA31144
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 12:51:09 -0500
Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net)
by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian))
id 17Few8-0005ql-00; Wed, 05 Jun 2002 10:51:08 -0700
Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.129])
by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian))
id 17Fevp-0001dd-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 05 Jun 2002 10:50:49 -0700
Received: from westrelay03.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.194.24])
by e31.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g55HolHj020456
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 13:50:47 -0400
Received: from smtp.linux.ibm.com (ltc-eth1000.torolab.ibm.com [9.26.4.197])
by westrelay03.boulder.ibm.com (8.11.1m3/NCO/VER6.1) with ESMTP id
g55Hojv213304
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 11:50:45 -0600
Received: from gromit.val.pok.ibm.com (heimdall.pok.ibm.com [9.117.148.143])
by smtp.linux.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42BC03FE06
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 13:50:44 -0400
(EDT)
Subject: Re: [Sisuite-devel] SystemConfigurator issues
From: Michael Chase-Salerno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: SI Suite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-devel>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: <sisuite-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-devel>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=sisuite-devel>
X-Original-Date: 05 Jun 2002 13:50:42 -0400
Date: 05 Jun 2002 13:50:42 -0400
Status: RO
Content-Length: 2855
Lines: 80
Ok, things have gotten a bit heated here and I think a lot of it is due
to misunderstandings.
Dave, we don't want to consider this a "dead issue" we certainly want
MSC to be able to use OSCAR, SIS and systemconfigurator. We do have to
keep in mind the many users that this is working for, but I'm sure there
is a solution to satisfy both camps.
If I can try and level-set, here are what I see as the issues:
The way modules.conf is configured doesn't meet MSC's needs. The
solution suggested by Sean was to modify the call to systemconfigurator
in the autoinstall script and provide a proper modules.conf in the
image.
The Hostname set by SC is fully qualified. The suggested solution in
this case was to create a new SC module specifically for MSC to set the
Hostname as a short hostname.
Can we please discuss the merits of these technical arguments? If there
are issues that I missed, please let us know as well.
Thanks,
Mike
On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 12:33, David N. Lombard wrote:
> Sean Dague wrote:
> [deletia]
> > I believe we
> > only are bickering at this point about whether:
> >
> > 1) --configsi == --confighw --confignet --runboot
> >
> > or
> >
> > 2) --configsi == --confignet --runboot
> >
> > Situation 1 works good for thousands of people, and breaks for you
> >
> > Situation 2 works good for you and breaks all the OSCAR > 1.2 users.
> ===
> Both your "belief" and conclusions are clearly incorrect. You haven't
> yet talked with a kernel developer.
>
> You've declared your solution as the only valid implementation of
> "--confighw". Multiple alternate implementations exist that do not
> break valid configurations, many also allow you to maintain your
> "investment."
>
> But, this is also clearly a dead issue. I'm sorry to have wasted
> everyone's time...
>
> --
> David N. Lombard Tune for maximum smoke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Director, Research & Development, HPC http://www.msclinux.com
> MSC.Software, 2 MacArthur Place, Santa Ana, CA 92707 +1.714.540.8900
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________
>
> Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sisuite-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-devel
_______________________________________________________________
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
_______________________________________________
Sisuite-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-devel
