>From sdague Wed Jun 5 12:36:32 2002
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by localhost.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53A42CE83
for <sdague@localhost>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 12:36:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.dague.net [64.26.55.212]
by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.0)
for sdague@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 05 Jun 2002 12:36:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
[216.136.171.252])
by garcia.siteprotect.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA19714
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 11:35:06 -0500
Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net)
by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian))
id 17FdkX-00016e-00; Wed, 05 Jun 2002 09:35:05 -0700
Received: from ns1.mscsoftware.com ([192.207.69.10] helo=draco.macsch.com)
by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian))
id 17Fdjx-0002BP-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 05 Jun 2002 09:34:29 -0700
Received: from tycho.scm.na.mscsoftware.com (tycho.scm.na.mscsoftware.com
[172.16.1.42])
by draco.macsch.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA12850;
Wed, 5 Jun 2002 09:34:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mscsoftware.com by tycho.scm.na.mscsoftware.com
(SMI-8.6/MSC.CTC.Solaris.MAILHUB.1.0)
id JAA13229; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 09:31:34 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "David N. Lombard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0rc3) Gecko/20020523
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sean Dague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: SI Suite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Sisuite-devel] SystemConfigurator issues
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-devel>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: <sisuite-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-devel>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=sisuite-devel>
X-Original-Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2002 09:33:51 -0700
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2002 09:33:51 -0700
Status: RO
X-Status: A
Content-Length: 1406
Lines: 41
Sean Dague wrote:
[deletia]
> I believe we
> only are bickering at this point about whether:
>
> 1) --configsi == --confighw --confignet --runboot
>
> or
>
> 2) --configsi == --confignet --runboot
>
> Situation 1 works good for thousands of people, and breaks for you
>
> Situation 2 works good for you and breaks all the OSCAR > 1.2 users.
===
Both your "belief" and conclusions are clearly incorrect. You haven't
yet talked with a kernel developer.
You've declared your solution as the only valid implementation of
"--confighw". Multiple alternate implementations exist that do not
break valid configurations, many also allow you to maintain your
"investment."
But, this is also clearly a dead issue. I'm sorry to have wasted
everyone's time...
--
David N. Lombard Tune for maximum smoke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Director, Research & Development, HPC http://www.msclinux.com
MSC.Software, 2 MacArthur Place, Santa Ana, CA 92707 +1.714.540.8900
_______________________________________________________________
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
_______________________________________________
Sisuite-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-devel
