On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:16:23PM -0600, Jerry G. DeLapp wrote: Content-Description: message body text > I've bashed through getting the 3.1.5-1 rpm buildable on redhat 9, and > have done some rudimentary testing (autoinstallcd works). It required > a number of repairs to the spec file, source code and make .rul files, > mostly to be able to apply patches to dosfstools and other src/ stuff > that didn't have the patches dir trick.
i maintain the debs, and just happened to inherit the rpms. However, i run debian on all my systems, so that's where i build the rpms. It is desirable for sis to be buildable everywhere. > Is there any interest in the results of this work, or am I duplicating > someone else's effort? yes, there's interest. > If there is interest, what's the 'right' way > to get my changes reviewed and accepted? http://www.systemimager.org/doc/html/develop.html in short, filing bugs w/ patches is the way to go, and target the 3.1/3.2 series - i don't think we'll be doing anymore 3.0.x stuff. > I really *need* for the > newer versions to be buildable as well as operational with redhat9, > since they've declared EOL in three months on all distributions prior > to 9, but I don't want to be a distraction. > > > -- > Jerry DeLapp (505) 665-4531 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Los Alamos National Labs -- CCN-7 Production Linux Systems Development weenie > PGP Public Key http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEAB8784F ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Sisuite-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-devel
