On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 12:22:09PM -0700, Jerry G. DeLapp wrote: > > There are two patches attached to this message. The 'tilde patch' gets rid of > more of what look like stray multiple install files.
committed. > The 'spec_doc patch' puts the HTML documentation back into the > systemimager-server RPM. committed. > Question... what's the 'rule' for updating the RPMs on SF? That is, should I > wait for someone to apply these and update the tarball, or should I just go > ahead and build with the patched specfile and not worry about the specfile in > the tarball? You don't need to wait for a new tarball, sometimes you'll just wanna make packaging changes. Its nice when the spec file in a tarball is the one used to build the -1 rpm, but that's not always possible. > One other thing... Brian was asking about the rpm name to get minfo... it is > mtools. Should I create another patch to add that as a dependency? Sure. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Sisuite-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-devel
