I uploaded 3.2.0-4 rpms before you posted that mtools should be in the client 
package, not the server.  So, of course, I put the dependency in the server 
package.  I've built a -5 rpm suite that has the dependency in the client 
package (untested, but the *only* change is the dependency). Do you want that 
update posted?  I can hold until I test further, or until there are more 
significant changes than that (e.g. see below).  I was really more motivated 
to get the docco available in the RPM rather than the dependency issue.

I was also wondering if I should move the documentation from the -server 
package to -common?  This would place the docs on client systems as well as 
servers.  I don't have a strong opinion on this.  Does anyone else?






-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
Sisuite-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-devel

Reply via email to