On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 10:19:41PM -0500, Brian Elliott Finley wrote:
> I just did a 'make ssh_source_tarball' for 3.2.1, but was wondering if
> the result is really what we want.  The only difference between the
> standard systemimager-source and the systemimager-ssh source is that the
> former contains all the src/tarballs* and the latter only contains the
> src/openssh* tarball.
> 
> If there are no issues with us uploading ssh code anymore, 

I don't know of anything that has changed since we originally had this
discussion - I know debian has formal approval to release crypto, by following
some defined processes.  I personally wouldn't upload a tarball with this
source without consulting a lawyer first.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
Sisuite-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-devel

Reply via email to