Hey Ben, First off, thanks for doing this work, you should have CVS access, so you can just put it in there when its ready.
I would suggest sticking to what is in CVS. Its true that it is a
release from RedHat corporation, but the product is separate from the
old RedHat Linuxes. It would also be consistent with the way SuSE's SLES
is handled now. Incidentally, the product is officially "RedHat
Enterprise Linux(EL)", the version is 3.x and there are 3 flavors of it,
WS for workstations, ES for mid-range servers, and AS for high-end
servers.
So I would suggest a directory like:
RedHatEL/3.0/stages
I don't think we would need to specify the specific flavors from a
stages perspective, but if so, they should be under the version
directory ala RedHatEL/3.0/AS/stages.
If there's a technical reason to go against this, then fine, but as long
as it makes sense, we should match what's already there.
Mike
On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 22:37, Benoit des Ligneris wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a patch (well, simply a new file in fact !)
> for systeminstaller RHAS 3.0 but I wonder how to manage
> it : I have the systeminstaller distributed with OSCAR, namely
> systeminstaller-1.04-1
>
> Howver, some files that are in the CVS are not in this release,
> especially the distinfo/RedHat3AS.
>
> As a consequence, I did add the RedHat/3AS/stages
>
> Is this correct or should I stick to the naming scheme that is in the
> CVS (RedHatAS/3/stages) ?
>
> I think that it should be RedHat/3AS/stages because it is a RedHat
> release, not a RedHatAS one...
>
> My .001 $
>
> Ben
--
Michael Chase-Salerno ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Everything takes longer, costs more, and is less useful.
-- Erwin Tomash
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
