See excerpt from i386 patch for an example of why this shouldn't be applied 
IMHO.

This is a really evil change to make to the i386 config, since we have users 
who couldn't deal with the i386 kernel actually being i586.  We had to step 
back from 586 for some of our users.

Ditto that for everything else you did to the chipset, like messing with the 
LCACHE shift. Ditto that for turning on ACPI stuff.  You didn't just trim it 
down, you changed the chipset and added things.

I'm willing to be overruled, but I think this is going to disenfranchise 
people who don't have p4's.



On Tuesday 11 January 2005 02:44 pm, Josh Aas wrote:
> Here are patches that trim down kernel configs for i386 and ia64.

An excerpt from the i386 patch...

@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@
Â# CONFIG_X86_GENERICARCH is not set
Â# CONFIG_X86_ES7000 is not set
Â# CONFIG_M386 is not set
-CONFIG_M486=y
+# CONFIG_M486 is not set
Â# CONFIG_M586 is not set
Â# CONFIG_M586TSC is not set
Â# CONFIG_M586MMX is not set
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
Â# CONFIG_MPENTIUMII is not set
Â# CONFIG_MPENTIUMIII is not set
Â# CONFIG_MPENTIUMM is not set
-# CONFIG_MPENTIUM4 is not set
+CONFIG_MPENTIUM4=y
Â# CONFIG_MK6 is not set
Â# CONFIG_MK7 is not set
Â# CONFIG_MK8 is not set


-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
Sisuite-devel mailing list
Sisuite-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-devel

Reply via email to