> si_monitor is included in the specfile patch I sent today. si_monitor is included yes, but I like to confirm that it is actually working and whether additional code needs to be added to make it complete.
> si_mkbootpackage > was included in the server package due to the line > %prefix/sbin/si_mk* > in the "%files server" section. Again, there are some issues here, namely SystemImager does not understand udev and thus if you try to use si_mkbootpackage on a system which uses udev, you won't be able to create a working initrd.img. > I'd rather expect this one to go to "common", because one > should be able to > build a boot package on any node, but well, that's not too bad. I agree. BTW, I have already sent a patch to Brian for the spec file, it contains a bit more items like adding requirement for perl-TermReadKey, %configure, Copyright -> License. The makefile needs to be updated so that it creates /var/lock/systemimager (needed by si_monitor). Cheers, Bernard ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=click _______________________________________________ Sisuite-devel mailing list Sisuite-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-devel
