> I'm ready to do this. I expect to have udev support ready very soon > after the 3.5.4 release, but think we should release 3.5.4 without it.
Like I said in the other email, I guess as long as we can tag now and tag again later (with udev additions), then I'm okay with it. I'm really eager to have that featured included in one form or another. Andrea, are you planning on checking anything else in? We'd like to tag 3.5.4 to be included with OSCAR. My feeling is that (time permitting) we will tag 3.5.5 with udev and reboot scripts and include that instead... > Because of the way svn does revision numbers, a revision > number uniquely > identifies a snapshot of the repository. Based on this, I've been > wondering if it would make sense to use the svn revision number as the > version number for future releases, and ditch the stable vs. unstable > bit. People have been using the unstable branch quite happily, as if > it were stable, for some time now. Are you saying that we will no longer have version #s like 3.x.x and just have SVN revision numbers? Cheers, Bernard ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click _______________________________________________ Sisuite-devel mailing list Sisuite-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-devel
