Hi Brian: > >Are you saying that we will no longer have version #s like 3.x.x and > >just have SVN revision numbers? > > That's the contemplation. The more I think about it, the > less I like it > though. Does anyone see any benefit in doing this?
I don't like it :-) I'd stick with the version numbers. In regards to stable vs unstable - I think it depends on what you want to call a release. I mean the soon to be released 3.6.0 is pretty stable and works quite well, but there are still minor bugs like error messages about "lstat" (or something like that) when you're imaging. As long as you give it sufficient time for the community to do pre-release testing, then we could just go with stable and ditch unstable. And you can definitely depend on the OSCAR developers/users for testing SystemImager and report any issues. P.S. We still need to sort out which Linux kernel(s) to include in the release tarball + SRPM before we can make a release... Cheers, Bernard ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click _______________________________________________ Sisuite-devel mailing list Sisuite-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-devel
