Bernard,

stop it! I found the problem! :-)

It was the SLOB allocator (http://lwn.net/Articles/157944/); it's more
memory efficient than the default SLAB, but it seems that with this
allocator rsync becomes very very slow... so better to use SLAB (in fact
in the x86_64 config it is correctly enabled).

Moreover I checked in the trunk the 2.6.16.2 kernel (for i386 only).. it
has some fixes and I already did the work to properly configure it
during the tests of today...

Cheers,
-Andrea

PS I've also added a comment about SLOB/SLAB issue on wiki
(http://wiki.sisuite.org/BOELupdate)!

http://lwn.net/Articles/157944/

Bernard Li wrote:
> I'd rather not downgrade the kernel at this point - hopefully newer
> releases will fix this problem.
> 
> rsync is currently at 2.6.7 (we're using 2.6.6), so after the svn
> server is back up I will try to see if that helps at all...
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Bernard
> 
> P.S. Incidentally, I tested trunk with x86_64 with e1000 (I think)
> and it works perfectly fine, so I'm not really sure what's going
> on...
> 


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Sisuite-devel mailing list
Sisuite-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-devel

Reply via email to