Le lundi 15 octobre 2007 15:54, dann frazier a écrit : > On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 11:31:24AM -0400, Geoffroy VALLEE wrote: > > You have to write a script that cleans up the system and execute it at > > package removal time. > > > > Also note that the "rule" file deals with the initrd-template in the > > binary-arch section, which is the section for arch dependent stuff. We > > may want to move that to binary-indep (even if it creates few issues)to > > keep things clean. I have a patch for that if you want. > > If this is not meant for official debs, it doesn't really matter, but > for official debs I used binary-arch for anything that is arch-specific > at *build time*, even if it gets packaged into a .all.deb. > > The reason being that the difference between binary-arch and > binary-indep seems to be to prevent build systems from having to > rebuild files that are identical across systems. The current > definition of these targets seems to be based on the assumption that > anything that must be built on a specific architecture should only be > installed on that architecture, where SystemImager is an obvious > counterexample.
Dann, Thanks for these details, i did not know that and i guess my patch is not usefull then (i am still learning). :-) Regards, -- Geoffroy ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ sisuite-devel mailing list sisuite-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-devel
