Hello, Andrea.

Thanks for your assistance.

I have new info as well, but I appreciate that changing the line numbers may have been necessary also.

The problem though, is that the mount order dependency was not noticed by SI, though it does work correctly in other cases.

For example, I have just been busy creating a golden image for the same hardware but a different OS (RedHat 8). we have the almost the same partitioning scheme but on that platform si_prepareclient/si_getimage correctly notices the mount dependency.

e.g.

        [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# fdisk -l /dev/hda

        Disk /dev/hda: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 4863 cylinders
        Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes

           Device Boot    Start       End    Blocks   Id  System
        /dev/hda1   *         1        13    104391   83  Linux
        /dev/hda2            14       274   2096482+  82  Linux swap
        /dev/hda3           275      4862  36853110   83  Linux
        [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# df -l
        Filesystem           1K-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
        /dev/hda3             35698972   3509900  30346420  11% /
        /dev/hda1               101089     19673     76197  21% /boot
        none                    515000         0    515000   0% /dev/shm

Note 2 differences between the partitioning scheme between my CentOS4.2 golden image and my RH8 image. They are:

1) there is only 1 swap partition on RH8 (hda2) whereas COS has 2 (hda2 and hda3) and
        2) the root partition is hda3 on RH8 and hda4 on COS.

There are numerous differences between RH8 and COS4 so perhaps some regression has found its way into the sorting and searching functions.

More likely is that the code is confused by 2 swap partitions, but this is just a guess as I havn't looked at it.


thanks again,

p

Paul Newman wrote:

Bernard Li wrote:

can do but how do I regenerate my autoinstall script? do I redo the
si_getimage? I notice there is also something called
si_mkautoinstallscript on the server. sounds promising but it is not
installed on the client. do i copy this over to the client and use it?


Yes you run si_mkautoinstallscript to regenerate the script (make sure
you make a backup copy before you run it).

The script is executed on the image server, which should contain a copy
of your golden image.

Hi, Bernard.

I changed <the image>/etc/systemimager/autoinstallscript.conf per your
suggestion and ran si_mkautoinstallscript. it generated a new
/var/lib/systemimager/scripts/<the image>.master

this is enclosed. note the order is still the same, i.e. wrong and will
result in an image that mounts root on top of /boot.



Paul,

you have to switch the 2 lines and modify the line number to have the
right mount order. Attached your autoinstallscript.conf correctly modified.

Anyway, the strange thing is that si_prepareclient should generate this
file properly, respecting the right order... in particular the order
should be the same of the `mount` command. What's the output of this
command in your golden client?

Regards,
-Andrea


------------------------------------------------------------------------



--
I'm afraid of commitment and will never submit


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Sisuite-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users

Reply via email to