Hi Bernard,

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bernard Li" <bern...@vanhpc.org>
To: <sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Cc: "E-Blokos" <in...@e-blokos.com>
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 6:55 PM
Subject: Re: [sisuite-users] Help test latest snapshot of SystemImager


> Hi Franck:
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:47 PM, E-Blokos <in...@e-blokos.com> wrote:
>
>> about sources it gives a patch error
>>
>> ./configure
>> ....
>> cd
>> /home/src/systemimager-4.1.99.svn4537.ext4_bli/initrd_source/src/sysvinit-2.8
>> 6.ds1.orig && cat
>> /home/src/systemimager-4.1.99.svn4537.ext4_bli/initrd_source/p
>> atches/sysvinit.compile_portability.patch
>> /home/src/systemimager-4.1.99.svn4537.
>> ext4_bli/initrd_source/patches/sysvinit.debian_rules.patch
>> /home/src/systemimage
>> r-4.1.99.svn4537.ext4_bli/initrd_source/patches/sysvinit.Makefile.patch <
>> /dev/n
>> ull | patch -p1
>> patching file src/bootlogd.c
>> patching file debian/rules
>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 9.
>> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file debian/rules.rej
>> patching file src/Makefile
>> make: ***
>> [/home/src/systemimager-4.1.99.svn4537.ext4_bli/initrd_source/src/sysv
>> init-2.86.ds1.orig.unpack] Error 1
>
> I would not consider this as a show-stopper, since users typically do
> not need to build SystemImager themselves and you mentioned that the
> RPMs I built work fine.  However, if you have a patch that allows the
> latest version to be built on Fedora 10, please feel free to post it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bernard

yes the RPMs work nice, but if I have enough time and knowledge to make a 
patch for
fedora 10 I will do it sure.
my experience with your last version (4.1.99 r4537) has been a success with 
a UYOK because
apparently the standard kernel doesn't include module for adaptec sata card.
so after netbooted and automatically installed a new node I noticed :
- after the image was installed before reboot a kernel panic occured
- even if in systemimager.conf NET_BOOT_DEFAULT was set in "local" at reboot 
it retried to reinstall the image
- the UUIDs of all HD failed (seems the module uuid didn't load) so I 
modified /etc/mdadm.conf to match the real /dev/sdX in the ARRAY lines
- I had to change manually the network-scripts
- I needed to boot first in rescue mode to rebuild all the Raid1 arrays

I don't know if these info are relevant for you.

Anyway this version works much better that the 4.0.2

Regards

Franck




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours and minutes
not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave Report as
part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service providers.
Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services and vision.
Read this report now!  http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo
_______________________________________________
sisuite-users mailing list
sisuite-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users

Reply via email to