Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, a banned books club kit

http://www.examiner.com/x-13062-Sacramento-Literature-Examiner~y2009m6d11-Fear-and-Loathing-in-Las-Vegas-a-banned-books-club-kit

June 11, 2009
by Shelley Blanton-Stroud

When I joined my son's high school banned book club in reading Hunter 
S. Thompson's Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, I was literally 
sickened by the description of Duke and Gonzo's constant 
intoxication.  Literally.  I felt woozy.  I did not know how this 
discussion was going to go and felt guilty to be reading the book 
along with them.

To my relief, they generally reported the same reaction I had.  One 
reader said she had to put it down periodically, walk around the room 
and get a drink of water to clear her head.  In spite of what parents 
might fear ­ that their kids would be persuaded by Duke to head right 
out to purchase shrooms and drive loaded to Las Vegas ­ the kids 
mainly wanted to discuss why Duke and Gonzo were so embittered, so 
focused on blurring their own vision of the world.  It was a great discussion.

Here are the background and discussion questions that got us started.

Why ban Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas?

This book has been challenged or banned by people who object to its 
offensive language, disrespect for religious, political and legal 
authority, and sexually explicit and emotionally disturbing scenes, 
including rampant drug and alcohol use and violence. Johnny Depp 
plays the drug-addled author in the 2005 film.

A Hunter S. Thompson thing to say:

"Reading the front page made me feel a lot better. Against that 
heinous background, my crimes were pale and meaningless. I was a 
relatively respectable citizen ­ a multiple felon, perhaps, but 
certainly not dangerous. And when the Great Scorer came to write 
against my name, that would surely make a difference. Or would it? I 
turned to the sports page and saw a small item about Muhammad Ali; 
his case was before the Supreme Court, the final appeal. He'd been 
sentenced to five years in prison for refusing to kill "slopes." "I 
ain't got nothin' against them Viet Congs," he said. Five years. 
Suddenly I felt guilty again."

Who is this Hunter S. Thompson?

Hunter Stockton Thompson (1937-2005), literary and political cult 
figure and leading practitioner of "Gonzo journalism," a term he created.
His political/cultural criticism of United States in 1970s flowed 
from series of stories about his own outsider adventures.
Son of Jack and Virginia (Ray) Thompson, Louisville, Kentucky.
After attending public schools, joined Air Force, receiving discharge in 1958.
Spent 1965 riding and living with Hell's Angels, leading to first 
published book, Hell's Angels: The Strange and Terrible Saga of the 
Outlaw Motorcycle Gangs (1966).
Late 1960s, wrote story on Kentucky Derby, transforming career. 
Drunken Thompson submitted only disorganized notes, rather than 
conventional article, focusing more on self than race, which was 
published intact and widely-acclaimed, creating what he called 
"Gonzo" journalism.
Assigned by Rolling Stone to cover motorcycle race and national drug 
law enforcement convention in Las Vegas, wrote two-part story as Fear 
and Loathing in Las Vegas (1971), immediately seen as masterpiece of 
new journalism ­ a genre he shares with Truman Capote.
Bizarre persona, featuring Hawaiian shirt, cigarette holder, and 
mirrored sunglasses, inspired Garry Trudeau's Raoul Duke in comic 
strip Doonesbury.
1985 to 1989, Thompson wrote syndicated column for San Francisco Examiner.
Lived on 100-acre farm in Woody Creek, Colorado, near Aspen, as 
compulsive hermit, drinking, riding motorcycles, playing loud music, 
and target shooting Chinese gongs with Magnum .44.
By age 50, charged with five felony counts of possessing drugs and 
possessing and storing explosives illegally.
1997 Terry Gilliam (formerly of Monty Python) directed movie with 
Johnny Depp as Thompson.
At age of 67, Thompson died of self-inflicted gunshot wound at his 
Colorado home Feb. 20, 2005.

What do you think about Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas?

Many current and historical artists and writers have claimed a 
heightening of their artistic perception through drugs.  As a reader, 
how do you see Duke's drug-induced perception?  How do you balance 
this against his paranoia?  What does this tell you about the 
perception and credibility of other writers, artists, musicians or 
opinion makers?
What do you think of Duke's rebellion and preference for immediate 
gratification?  Does he appeal to the American reader or offend 
us?  Can you think of other characters in art or literature or film 
that attract/repel us in the same way?
Thompson's attorney, Dr. Gonzo, remains drugged throughout the story, 
behaving far more impulsively and criminally than thoughtfully.  What 
does this character tell us about Thompson's view of law and 
order?  How about other law related characters in the book?
After the hitchhiker, a typical middle-American kid, is picked up by 
Thompson and his attorney, he jumps out of their car in terror. How 
does Thompson want us to see the Hitchhiker?  How does he want us to 
see himself through the Hitchhiker's eyes?  Why?
Thompson calls Circus-Circus the "vortex of the American 
Dream".  Why?  What does Thompson think the American Dream is and 
what do you think?
Thompson and his attorney drive cars they call the Great Red Shark 
and the White Whale.  What does the author think they represent for 
his characters?  What do you think?  What does a car mean to 
you?  What does a car mean in American culture?
Where is the "fear and loathing" in this novel?  Who is fearful?  Who 
loathes?  Why?  Should they?  What is the root of this fear and 
loathing?  What real world experiences seem connected to these 
feelings?  Is this fear and loathing unreasonable?  Natural?
In the beginning of his book, Thompson cites Samuel Johnson: "He who 
makes a beast of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man." What 
does that mean to Thompson? To you?
What is this novel's take on morality?  Is anything here either moral 
or immoral?  Is everything amoral?
Does a book like this, so full of illegal behavior, make those 
behaviors more attractive to teen readers?  Why or why not?  Would 
you recommend this book to other teens?  Why or why not?  Should this 
be banned?


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Sixties-L" group.
To post to this group, send email to sixties-l@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sixties-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sixties-l?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to