I am tuned out completely on either 1099OID or Redemption by Method! This for 
most of the day! All other stuff beaming through! Either I am shot down from 
these two sites or they have been crimped! Any ideas here! You in touch?
~Hal~

SilverDollar <[email protected]> wrote: Note to Patrick Devine and to all 
who acknowledge his notices:

This a little bit of propoganda thrown out there to scare away
 the mis-informed, which is all well in good because most people
 who are lazy minded or make an excuse to avoid learning the
 process and just want templates to fill in their own information
 are doomed to fail.
 I have heard it all from people; " I know the material, I just need
 an example to help get me started ". Well when I ask them a
 question pertaining to the material and they cannot answer it,
 I have pretty much busted them on their scheme.
 These people don't realize how much trouble they can get into
 if they do not know how to defend what they are doing and the
fact that they might be in a dire need of emergency help does
NOT in any way change the principles of the risk. So often
 these type of people when they do fail the mentor gets blamed for
 it then even more excuses follow another big mess.
 ALERT TO THE PEOPLE! : 
 Mentors are NOT there for to accept your risks and liability.

If you are a Mentor, get a disclaimer signed no matter what, that
the information you are giving is not fact, it is a fictional interpretation
for entertainment until the proposed knowledge is verified.
 
Take heed to the NOTICE on the door of the society called the
United States of America,  this NOTICE is labeled  Constitution
Of The United States Of America. Whoever shall enter this door
must accept all liability for the contracts and private agreements
 they enter into.

POA, AIF, AR, SPC, TPI are all attorney's in one form or another, but
you have to know the rules for each PERSONHOOD. Notice, I did
not say " strawman ".

SD


 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Lyn 
Date: Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:08 AM
Subject: Fw: [1099-OID] ANOTHER IRS FRAUD ALERT
To: "SD" <[email protected]>, 
 

 Please check out the two attachments above and let me know your thoughts on 
it. I think you should ask Patrick Devine about it also.
 Lyn
 
 
 
  Problem Alerts
 
 Form 1099-OID Fraud
 
 Oct. 10, 2008
 
 The IRS cautions taxpayers to avoid getting caught up
 in a new tax fraud disguised as a debt payment option
 for credit cards or mortgage debt. The fraud is also
 marketed as a way to reduce taxes or pay outstanding
 tax liabilities. It involves the filing of Form
 1099-OID, Original Issue Discount, and/or bogus
 financial instruments such as bonded promissory notes
 or sight drafts.
 
 This fraud has evolved from an earlier frivolous
 argument that a "strawman" bank account has been
 created at the Treasury Department for each U.S.
 citizen, and that individuals could use such
 "strawman" accounts to pay debts and claim withholding
 credits.
 
 The IRS addresses the "strawman" argument in Revenue
 Ruling 2005-21 and Revenue Ruling 2004-31, and
 discredits the use of this position for income tax
 purposes. Moreover, the courts that have reviewed the
 "strawman" argument and other similar arguments have
 found them frivolous.
 
 For more information on frivolous schemes, see The
 Truth About Frivolous Arguments.
 
 
 ------------------------------------
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/1099-OID/
 
 <*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional
 
 <*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/1099-OID/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)
 
 <*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[email protected]
    mailto:[email protected]
 
 <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]
 
 <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 
  
 
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 
 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.13/1916 - Release Date: 1/26/2009 
7:08 AM
 

      revrul    p{font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica; font-size: 10pt} 
td{font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica; font-size: 10pt} li{font-family: 
verdana, arial, helvetica; font-size: 10pt} h1{font-family: verdana, arial, 
helvetica; font-size: 12pt; font-style: bold} h2{font-family: verdana, arial, 
helvetica; font-size: 10pt; font-style: bold}    Internal Revenue Service
 Revenue Ruling
  TaxLinks.com   sm
 Rev. Rul. 2004-31
 Rev. Rul. 2004-31, 2004-12 I.R.B. 617 
                        Internal Revenue Service (I.R.S.)
                                  Revenue Ruling
               FRIVOLOUS TAX RETURNS; MERITLESS "REMOVAL ARGUMENTS."
                              Released: March 3, 2004
                             Published: March 22, 2004
  Section 61.--Gross Income Defined
   Frivolous tax returns; meritless "removal arguments."  This ruling 
emphasizes to taxpayers, and to promoters and return preparers who  assist 
taxpayers with schemes, that there is no law, court decision or other  
authority that permits a taxpayer to remove himself from the federal tax system 
 in order to avoid otherwise applicable taxes. Arguments to the contrary are 
not  only wrong, but frivolous.
   Frivolous tax returns; meritless "removal arguments."  This ruling 
emphasizes to taxpayers, and to promoters and return preparers who  assist 
taxpayers with schemes, that there is no law, court decision or other  
authority that permits a taxpayer to remove himself from the federal tax system 
 in order to avoid otherwise applicable taxes. Arguments to the contrary are 
not  only wrong, but frivolous.
 PURPOSE
   The Service is aware that some individuals are  attempting to reduce their 
federal income tax obligations by claiming that they  have been "removed" or 
"redeemed" from the federal tax system. Although the  specific arguments made 
by these individuals vary, some argue that the  Government commits a fraud when 
it attempts to collect debts, including tax  debts, and that this purported 
fraud allows individuals to "chargeback" debts  that the Government purportedly 
owes to these individuals to eliminate any  asserted tax liability. "Removal," 
"redemption," and "chargeback" schemes are  referred to here collectively as 
"removal schemes" and "removal arguments." Some  promoters are marketing a 
package, kit, or other materials that claim to show  individuals how they can 
avoid paying income taxes based on these and other  meritless arguments.
   This revenue ruling emphasizes to individuals, and to  promoters and return 
preparers who assist individuals with these schemes, that  there is no 
authority under any U.S. law that supports the argument that an  individual can 
be "removed" or "redeemed" from the federal tax system to avoid  tax 
liabilities or that an individual can satisfy debts, including tax  
liabilities, by making "chargeback" or other similar arguments. Removal and  
redemption arguments have no merit and are frivolous.
   The Service is committed to identifying individuals  who attempt to avoid or 
evade their tax obligations. The Service will take  vigorous enforcement action 
against these taxpayers and against promoters and  return preparers who assist 
taxpayers in taking these frivolous positions.  Frivolous returns and other 
similar documents submitted to the IRS are processed  through the Service's 
Frivolous Return Program. As part of this program, the  Service confirms 
whether taxpayers who take frivolous positions have filed all  of their 
required tax returns, computes the correct amount of tax and interest  due, and 
determines whether civil and criminal penalties should apply. The  Service also 
determines whether civil or criminal penalties should apply to  return 
preparers, promoters, and others who assist taxpayers in taking frivolous  
positions, and recommends whether a court injunction should be sought to halt  
such activities. Other information about frivolous tax positions is
 available on  the Service website at www.irs.gov.
 DISCUSSION OF REMOVAL AND REDEMPTION ARGUMENTS AND  SCHEMES
   Removal arguments and schemes are loosely related and  take a variety of 
different forms. Proponents of removal arguments and schemes  typically claim, 
even though they remain citizens or residents of the U.S., that  they are not 
required to file federal tax returns and pay their tax obligations  because 
they have been removed or redeemed from the federal tax system. As a  result of 
participating in removal schemes, these individuals do not file  required 
returns or pay the income tax that they owe.
   In some variations of the removal argument,  individuals claim that the 
Government commits a fraud when it attempts to  collect debts, including tax 
debts, and that this purported fraud allows  individuals to "chargeback" debts 
that the Government purportedly owes to these  individuals to eliminate any 
liability to the Government. In other variations,  individuals argue that 
Federal Reserve notes, or "paper money," are not legal  tender and that the 
Government has been wrongfully using taxpayers and their  labor as security for 
the Government's obligations. Other individuals argue that  they may reclaim, 
or "chargeback," their own value from the Government as a  result of the 
Government's wrongful conduct and then use that value to pay the  individuals' 
debts. Participants in removal schemes often attempt to offset,  collect or 
"redeem" their asserted claims against the Government by using or  filing 
liens, bills of exchange, and various Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) 
 forms, or by relying on misinterpretations of federal laws and the Uniform  
Commercial Code.
   Participants in the removal schemes may rely on one or  more of the 
following erroneous arguments, alleged facts or actions to support  their 
frivolous claims: (a) the bankruptcy of the United States occurred  
contemporaneously with the creation of the Federal Reserve, the start of the  
Great Depression, the removal of the United States from the gold standard, or  
the passage of House Joint Resolution 192 (claimed to be a declaration of  
bankruptcy); (b) the Government's use of birth certificates of taxpayers as  
registered securities; (c) the filing of documents with variations on a  
taxpayer's name, (e.g., using all capital letters in some documents and 
standard  capitalization in others) creates a "straw man" or "nom de guerre" as 
the debtor  to the Government that replaces the individual who has removed 
himself from the  Government's jurisdiction; (d) the "redemption" of debts from 
the Government by  filing UCC forms, such as the UCC-1 form; (e) the submission 
of
 documents to the  U.S. Secretary of the Treasury to establish a fictitious 
bank account (sometimes  referred to as a "Treasury Direct Account") where the 
value of charged back  debts is located; (f) the practice of "accepting for 
value" official Government  documents and the "charging back" of those 
documents by responding to them with  a "private notice" that may include a 
"Treasury Direct Account Number," a  "Memory of Account Number" or a "Posted 
Certified Account Number"; and (g) the  use of "Bills of Exchange," Form UCC-3 
and "Sight Drafts" to discharge debts to  the 
 Government. This list is not exclusive, however.  Participants in removal 
schemes also make other equally frivolous arguments.
   Instead of filing federal income tax returns with the  Service, participants 
in removal schemes frequently send documents and other  correspondence to the 
Service and other Government agencies. Examples of these  documents include: 
improperly filed Forms 1040-ES, Estimated Tax for  Individuals, reporting the 
location of the funds in a fictitious bank account  from which the IRS can 
collect taxes; improperly filed Fiduciary Tax Returns;  improperly filed Forms 
8300, Report of Cash Payments Over $10,000 Received in a  Trade or Business, 
reporting that a person or entity has "charged back" after  "accepting for 
value" the Government's documents; improperly filed Forms W-9,  Request for 
Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification, to obtain a social  security 
or employee identification number of a person or entity to include on  the Form 
8300; "commercial affidavits" in lieu of tax returns stating that the  filer is 
a secured party and has no income for a particular
 year; and documents  and correspondence to "accept for value" IRS notices of 
tax liens and levies to  have the tax balances paid from the filer's "Treasury 
Direct Account."
   There is no authority under any U.S. law that supports  the claim that 
individuals may avoid their federal income tax obligations based  on removal 
arguments such as those described in this revenue ruling. Similarly,  there is 
no authority under any U.S. law that supports the claim that requiring  payment 
of a debt owed to the Government by commercially acceptable means  amounts to a 
fraud by the Government. Section 61 of the Internal Revenue Code  provides that 
gross income includes all income from whatever source derived,  including 
compensation for services. Adjustments to income, deductions, and  credits must 
be claimed in accordance with the provisions of the Internal  Revenue Code and 
the Treasury regulations thereunder and other applicable  federal law. Section 
6011 provides that any person liable for any tax imposed by  the Internal 
Revenue Code shall make a return when required by Treasury  regulations, and 
that returns must be in accordance with Treasury
 regulations  and IRS forms. Section 6012 identifies the persons who are 
required to file  income tax returns. Section 6151, except as specifically 
provided, requires that  taxpayers pay their tax when the return is due. 
Section 6311 requires payment of  taxes by commercially acceptable means as 
prescribed by Treasury Regulations.
   Courts repeatedly have rejected removal arguments and  other similar 
arguments as frivolous and have penalized taxpayers who make these  types of 
arguments. See, e.g., United States v. Sloan, 939 F.2d 499, 500 (7th  Cir. 
1991) (affirming criminal conviction for tax evasion and rejecting "wholly  
defective" arguments that the federal tax laws did not apply to taxpayer 
because  he was a "freeborn, natural individual, a citizen of the State of 
Indiana, and a  'master' -- not -- 'servant' of his Government"); United States 
v. Condo, 741  F.2d 238, 239 (9th Cir. 1984) (affirming criminal conviction for 
tax fraud and  rejecting as "frivolous" the argument that Federal Reserve Notes 
are not valid  currency, cannot be taxed, and are merely "debts"); United 
States v. Rickman,  638 F.2d 182, 184 (10th Cir. 1980) (affirming criminal 
conviction for willfully  failing to file a return and rejecting the taxpayer's 
argument that "the Federal  Reserve Notes in which he was paid were not
 lawful money within the meaning of  Art. 1, s 8, United States Constitution").
   Although individuals who rely on these removal  arguments generally do not 
file federal income tax returns with the Service,  some individuals also are 
relying on removal or similar frivolous arguments to  claim that they can 
reduce or eliminate their tax by filing tax returns in which  they report zero 
income and tax liability. See Rev. Rul. 2004-34, 2004-12 I.R.B.  619 
(3/22/2004), for a discussion of this frivolous position.
 CIVIL AND CRIMINAL PENALTIES
   The Service will challenge the claims of individuals  who attempt to avoid 
or evade their federal tax liability by refusing to file  returns and pay tax 
on the basis that they have been removed or redeemed from  the federal tax 
system. In addition to liability for the tax due plus statutory  interest, 
individuals who fail to file and pay tax or who claim refunds based on  this or 
any other frivolous arguments face substantial civil and criminal  penalties. 
Potential civil penalties include: (1) the section 6651(f) penalty  for 
fraudulent failure to file, which is up to 75 percent of the amount of taxes  
the taxpayer should have reported on the return ; (2) the section 6651(a)(1)  
penalty for failure to file, which is equal to up to 25 percent of the amount 
of  taxes the taxpayer should have reported on the return; (3) the section  
6651(a)(2) penalty for failure to pay, which is equal to .5 percent of the tax  
for each month or fraction of a month the tax remains unpaid,
 not to exceed a  total of 25 percent; and; (4) a penalty of up 
 to $25,000 under section 6673 if the taxpayer makes  frivolous arguments in 
the United States Tax Court.
   Individuals relying on this scheme also may face  criminal prosecution for:  
(1) attempting to evade or defeat tax under section  7201 for which the penalty 
is a fine of up to $100,000 and imprisonment for up  to 5 years; (2) willful 
failure to make a return or pay tax under section 7203  for which the penalty 
is up to $25,000 and imprisonment of up to 1 year, or (3)  making false 
statements under section 7206 for which the penalty is a fine of up  to 
$100,000 and imprisonment for up to 3 years.
   Persons who promote this scheme and those who assist  taxpayers in claiming 
tax benefits based on this scheme also may face penalties.  Potential penalties 
include: (1) a $250 penalty under section 6694 for each  return prepared by an 
income tax return preparer who knew or should have known  that the taxpayer's 
argument was frivolous (or $1,000 for each return where the  return preparer's 
actions were willful, intentional or reckless); (2) a $1,000  penalty under 
section 6701 for aiding and abetting the understatement of tax;  and (3) 
criminal prosecution under section 7206 for which the penalty is a fine  of up 
to $100,000 and imprisonment for up to 3 years for assisting or advising  about 
the preparation of a false return or other document under the internal  revenue 
laws. Promoters and others who assist taxpayers in engaging in these  schemes 
also may be enjoined from doing so under section 7408.
 HOLDING
   Individuals may not avoid or evade their tax liability  by refusing to file 
returns and pay tax on the basis that they have been removed  or redeemed from 
the federal tax system or by claiming that they can  "chargeback" their debts 
to the Government. Arguments that individuals may be  removed or redeemed from 
the federal tax system or may "chargeback" their debts  to the Government have 
no merit and are frivolous. Individuals who attempt to  reduce their federal 
tax liability by taking frivolous positions based on these  arguments will be 
liable for the actual tax due plus statutory interest. In  addition, the 
Service will determine civil penalties against individuals where  appropriate, 
and those individuals may also face criminal prosecution. The  Service also 
will determine appropriate civil penalties against persons who  prepare 
frivolous returns or promote frivolous positions, and those persons may  also 
face criminal prosecution. Promoters and others who assist
 taxpayers in  engaging in these schemes also may be enjoined from doing so 
under section 7408.
 DRAFTING INFORMATION
   This revenue ruling was authored by the Office of  Associate Chief Counsel  
(Procedure and Administration), Administrative  Provisions and Judicial 
Practice Division. For further information regarding  this revenue ruling, 
contact that office at (202) 622-4940 (not a toll-free  call).
  Rev. Rul. 2004-31, 2004-12 I.R.B. 617 
  

       

Reply via email to