Bob~ Into day two of baking soda therapy -- still socking down bicarb and still going strong while picking up steam!! Your forward is MOST interesting from many corners. Mine of course is one of those WITHOUT the UNITED STATES so for your purposes here I am rather innocuous! Nonetheless I will circulate some periphery fact which SHOULD awaken at least a few slowly beating hearts! My good ole "bottom line" here is going to find complete "residence" (To use the unlegalese version of the word) in the term "USURPATION"! What is being urged in your forward – as you surely realize – is the further blatant acknowledgment by “RANK AND FILE”Americans that they either CANNOT or WILL NOT FACE THE FACT WHICH IS THAT THOSE WHO ARE TO BE ADDRESSED ARE OUTRIGHT TYRANNICAL AND USURPATIOUS DESPOTS! Instead of coming to terms with this despicable character flaw seen so characteristic on the bald face of American pretension, the “easy way out” chosen is to continue these cutthroat buccaneers in their veneered mantle of De Jure representatives of a sovereign American people. Have I repeated before Bacon’s divinely inspired words, “NOTHING DOTH MORE HURT IN A STATE THAN THAT CUNNING MEN BE TAKEN AS WISE.”, or might I rather say, when can that be repeated enough until the light begins to crack the UGLY AND COWARDLY American mind-set? THESE SOCIALIST FREAKS WHO ARE De Facto stand-ins, long displaced REAL THINGS! Here is something you well know which cannot travel far from you until it becomes a dark secret: MEN WHO OCCUPY DE JURE OFFICES AS DE FACTO STAND-INS ARE BOUND TO DO SO PER THE EXACT PARAMETERS OF THAT OFFICE AS EDICTED UPON ITS CREATION BEFORE THEIR ARRIVAL! When Lincoln &co seized these De Jure offices they did so in absolute piratical pretense; NOTHING HAS CHANGED! Nothing that is except the American People, performing like Pavlov’s dogs, have concluded Man and boy that they might avoid some physical discomforts if they would acquiesce to an immensity of mental obeisance by accepting as their Lords and Masters certain liars who would as well pretend they were existing only to piously serve their fellow man! How may all such fools as these be best described? Is “fools” by and of itself sufficient? Of these foul and demeaning things I say about those pretentious and foolish people I speak of whom you would urge to “write their representatives”, there is one characteristic upon which you and every truly thinking person must concur; those who you so engage must first fall into the pit of pretense of belief they are writing to someone who truly GIVES A DAMN! NO MAN HAS EVER ENGAGED IN MORE FUTILE OR DEGRADING SELF-DECEPTION!~Hal~
________________________________ From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sun, December 20, 2009 12:54:53 AM Subject: URGENT!!!!!! Senate Vote On Health Care Scheduled THIS WEEKEND! To All: I am sending this as a sample. You will need to use the appropriate information for your state and the proper addresses for your senators. This is your last chance unless you want government death care. Please get this Constructive Notice to your respective senator. Bob J From: "Stephanie-FedUpUSA" <[email protected]> >Date: December 19, 2009 1:54:27 PM GMT-05:00 >To: "'Rose'" <[email protected]> >Subject: RE: URGENT!!!!!! Senate Vote On Health Care Scheduled THIS WEEKEND! > >Yup – I don’t pass along legal information that is inaccurate. As a member of >the Michigan Bar, I’d be in deep doo-doo if I did. A quick look on Westlaw >confirmed you did a great job. As the news is reporting, the U. S. Senate will be voting on the Health Care Reform at 1 am Monday. Today is Saturday and I am emailing this letter to Senators Levin and Stabenow. You are all welcome to use this letter to put our senators on Notice of Insturction and hold them to their Oath of Office. These are your rights and it's up to you to enforce them. You may also want to share this with your family, firends, and neighbors. The more of these Constructive Notices that our senators receive, the better chance we have of enforcing a petition of Redress or Petition of Recall. CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE OF INSTRUCTION STATE CONSTITUTION (EXCERPT) CONSTITUTION OF MICHIGAN OF 1963 § 3 Assembly, consultation, instruction, petition. Sec. 3. The people have the right peaceably to assemble, to consult for the common good, to instruct their representatives and to petition the government for redress of grievances. History: Const. 1963, Art. I, § 3, Eff. Jan. 1, 1964 Former Constitution: See Const. 1908, Art. II, § 2. TO: Washington, DC Office Senator Debbie Stabenow 133 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Phone: (202) 224-4822 e-mail: [email protected] WASHINGTON Carl Levin 269 Russell Office Building U.S. Senate Washington, DC 20510-2202 Phone (202) 224-6221 Fax (202) 224-1388 TTY (202) 224-2816 8:30 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. [email protected] Dear Senators Levin and Stabenow, It is my understanding from the news reports that you are scheduled to vote in this Illegal and Unconstitutional Health Care Reform Act on Monday at 1 am. I am putting you on CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE OF INSTRUCTION that you do not have any LEGAL CONSTITUTIONAL authority to vote yes on this issue. Therefor, you must vote no or you will be in VIOLATION of your OATH OF OFFICE and subject to removal. Congress lacks the constitutional authority to regulate and control the practice of medicine in the jurisdiction of the States. See Linder v. United States, 268 U.S. 5, 18, 45 S.Ct. 446 (1925) ("Obviously, direct control of medical practice in the states is beyond the power of the federal government"); Lambert v. Yellowly, 272 U.S. 581, 589, 47 S.Ct. 210 (1926) ("It is important also to bear in mind that 'direct control of medical practice in the States is beyond the power of the Federal Government.' Linder v. United States 268 U.S. 5, 18. Congress, therefore, cannot directly restrict the professional judgment of the physician or interfere with its free exercise in the treatment of disease. Whatever power exists in that respect belongs to the states exclusively.") Oregon v. Ashcroff, 368 F.3d 1118, 1124 (9th Cir. 2004) ("The principle that state governments bear the primary responsibility for evaluating physician assisted suicide follows from our concept of federalism, which requires that state lawmakers, not the federal government, are 'the primary regulators of professional [medical] conduct.' Conant v. Walters, 309 F.3d 629, 639 (9th Cir. 2002); Barsky v. Bd. of Regents, 347 U.S. 442, 449, 74 S.Ct 650, 98 L.ED. 829 (1954) ('It is elemental that a state has broad power to establish and enforce standards of conduct within its broders relative to the health of everyone there. It is a vital part of a state's police power.') The Attorney General 'may not...regulate [the doctor-patient] relationship to advance federal policy.' Conant, 309 F3d at 647 (Kozinski, J., concurring).") And certain features of this proposed law will certainly be unconstitutional; see: United States v. Constantine, 296, U.S. 287, 56 S.Ct. 223 (1935) "We think the suggestion has never been made -- certainly never entertained by this Court -- that the United States may impose cumulativepenalties above and beyond those specified by state law for infractions of the state's criminal code by its own citizens. The affirmative of such a proposition would obliterate the distinction between the delegated powers of the federal government and those reserved to the states and to their citizens. The implications from a decision sustaining such an imposition would be startling. The concession of such a power would open the door to unlimited regulation of matters of state concern by federal authority. The regulation of the conduct of its own citizens belongs to the state, not to the United States. The right to impose sanctions for violations of the state's laws inheres in the body of its citizens speaking through their representatives. So far as the reservations of the Tenth Amendment were qualified by the adoption of the Eighteenth, the qualification has been abolished. (emphases added) THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION Article. IV. Section. 3. Clause 2: The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to Prejudice any Claims of the United States, or of any particular State. CONSTITUTION OF MICHIGAN OF 1835 ARTICLE I BILL OF RIGHTS Political power. First. All political power is inherent in the people. Right of the people. 2. Government is instituted for the protection, security, and benefit of the people; and they have the right at all times to alter or reform the same, and to abolish one form of government and establish another, whenever the public good requires it. Right to assemble and petition. 20. The people shall have the right freely to assemble together, to consult for the common good, to instruct their representatives, and to petition the legislature for redress of grievances. Acts void. 21. All acts of the legislature contrary to this or any other article of this Constitution shall be void.
