Tom~ I found four errors in this! One is the use of a preposition rather than a conjunction, or vice versa, I can't find it again; another the repetition of the word or; the third the labling of an ens legis to be a "Natural Person" which is a reverse of the intended use; and the use of the word "inalienable" instead of the much more restrictive term "Unalienable" as you will find in the Uanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America! Other than these I find the information irrefutable, so enjoy! ~Hal~
--- On Thu, 2/18/10, George Cozby <[email protected]> wrote: From: George Cozby <[email protected]> Subject: Fw: [national_lawman] savethemales.ca - The Ficticious Legal Entity Called "a Person" To: "George Co" <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, February 18, 2010, 9:39 PM ----- Forwarded Message ---- From: Angela Stark <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thu, February 18, 2010 4:41:29 PM Subject: [national_lawman] savethemales.ca - The Ficticious Legal Entity Called "a Person" Please read this article A The Fictitious Legal Entity Called "a Person" February 14, 2010 | by Paul Vergehttp://www.henrymakow.com/the_ficticious_legal_entity_ca.html __._,_.___ Reply to sender | Reply to group Messages in this topic (1) Recent Activity: New Members 1 Visit Your Group Start a New Topic Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use . __,_._,___
