On 31 Aug 2008, at 6:26 PM, Mauro Mazzieri wrote:

>> The latest version of AppleGlot (v3.4) certainly works on Leopard.
>> ADViewer doesn't, but the files can be edited with any text editor. I
>> use Xcode myself.
>
> Translating with a text editor is not comparable at all to translating
> using a localization tool.

This is more a personal preference. I like to be able to be able to  
edit text files rather than having to deal with opaque data blobs in  
some private format. For example, when a bug in ibtool or nibtool  
messes up the database I can go in and fixed that (I actually have  
done that).

>
>> Because of the problems I'm still having with iLocalize, and  
>> because I
>> don't know it, I would personally prefer if you would use either
>> Localization Suite or AppleGlot. The advantage of Localization Suite
>> is that you can import existing localizations, so you don't need to
>> start from scratch. Another advantage of Localization Suite is that  
>> it
>> separates the work for the developer and the translator. The  
>> interface
>> for the translator is pretty intuitive.
>
> I don't think that the fact you don't know iLocalize can be a valid
> motivation to prevent contributors using it; once translations are
> created, they can be edited using any software.

Not really. You can't move a localization from one system to another,  
you basically need to start over from scratch. The fact is that if  
there's a problem, I won't be able to help. Moreover, I'm not able to  
asses whether iLocalize does the right thing. And I did have problems  
with localizations produced by iLocalize.

>
> I completely disagree with the statement that Localization Suite
> interface is pretty intuitive.

Note that I'm talking about Localizer only. I agree that Localization  
Manager is not very intuitive. But the point is that a translator  
needs to use only Localizer.

> Actually, is the worst documented
> software I ever saw. The disk image came with two applications,
> Localization Manager and Localizer. On the website there is no
> documentation. Localization Manager has no help. Localizer has a short
> and outdated help; it only says to open a .loc file, with no mention
> of how to create it. With iLocalize, for comparison, I can simply
> import the application bundle and export the file to be committed,
> doing both AppleGlot and ADviewer work in one step.

The fact that it has no help is indeed not very nice, but that's just  
because it's a beta, for which the Help has not yet been written.

The thing about Localization Suite is that the translator only needs  
to do the translation step using Localizer. The actual creation and  
application of .loc files is left to the developer. Moreover I can  
choose which files can be localized and which are not, I don't know  
whether iLocalize can do that (I know AppleGlot can't).

>
> However, as there is a requirement for Tiger compatibility, I finally
> found a way to make the translation Tiger-compatible (I have to
> install Xcode 2.5, downloading from ADC website).
> I'll made the commit once the localization is Tiger-compatible.
>
> -- 
> Mauro Mazzieri


Please use Xcode 3 and ibtool for localization. If it's done right it  
should be compatible with Tiger. I don't know how iLocalize works with  
the various versions, but I know AppleGlot and Localization Suite work  
properly Toger compatible. nibtool has many bugs that have been fixed  
(now) in ibtool. And using 2.x and 3.x tools together actually leads  
to various problems I'd like to avoid in the future.

Christiaan


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Skim-app-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/skim-app-users

Reply via email to