Hi,

I tested it again. On a zoomed-in document, the behaviour is :

- the down arrow takes me directly to top of the next page.
- the up arrow takes me directly to the bottom of the preceding page.

I was confused at first because the move from centered to top or centered to bottom gave me the impression I was navigating in the same page.

Best regards,

Guillaume Daudin



------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 16:09:09 +0200
From: Christiaan Hofman <cmhof...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Skim-app-users] up arrow issue
To: For general discussion about using Skim
        <skim-app-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <54373f48-5daa-461a-a3b5-475bb577f...@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

I?ve put a new test version at the same location. It should scroll and navigate in the same direction as the release (as I described), so if it doesn?t you must have a cached download. Can you test that again?

Christiaan

On Oct 12, 2016, at 12:15, Christiaan Hofman <cmhof...@gmail.com> wrote:

Huh, are you sure? It should work like the release, not the other way around. Are you sure you did not somehow cache the previous test version?

Christiaan

On Oct 12, 2016, at 11:13, Guillaume Daudin <gdau...@mac.com> wrote:


The latest test version works the same way. Actually, I find this more
convenient (if slightly counter-intuitive) than the regular release,
despite the bug.

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 00:51:37 +0200
From: Christiaan Hofman <cmhof...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Skim-app-users] up arrow issue
To: For general discussion about using Skim
        <skim-app-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <d6f24aa0-0fa6-4b11-a879-bda88419d...@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

I?ve put another test version in the same location. Could you try that
out?

Christiaan

On Oct 11, 2016, at 23:17, Christiaan Hofman <cmhof...@gmail.com> wrote:


On Oct 11, 2016, at 21:51, Guillaume Daudin <gdau...@mac.com
<mailto:gdau...@mac.com>> wrote:

Hi Christiaan,

Ah, I might have mixed things up (I am using the French version).

shift+cmd+R is Automatically Resize and
cmd+_ is zoom to fit ?

That?s correct (auto resize is "keep zoomed to fit", rather than a one
time zoom to fit).
Anyway, whether I do one or the other it does not change the issue I
have with the "annotated" file.

I am indeed on Single Page. I do not have the issue when I do ?Page
Unique en continu? (which is probably "continuous scrolling").

The keyboard up arrow (nor page up) does not navigate at all (the
buttons work fine).

The down arrow works like a charm.

That?s really weird, as the implementations are the exact mirror image
of each other.

I wish I knew why tis was happening, but I don?t, so I fear I cannot fix this. All I can hope Apple will fix this, though they didn?t in 10.11,
and they didn?t in 10.12.
Ah. Zooming out (or in) solves the issue (well, my text is too small/big
now?)

It works fine with the test version you put on forge, except that when I
zoom in (but not in zoom to fit), up and down arrows + space and
shift_space work strangely. E.g. space takes me to the bottom of the
page and then the preceding page rather than the following one. down
arrow to the top and then the following page ?

Guillaume


Thanks for testing this. So apparently PDFKit still works the same way it did on 10.11, which means buggy. Even if Apple assured me they fixed
it, for the second time, and they lied, again.

Christiaan

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Skim-app-users mailing list
Skim-app-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/skim-app-users

Reply via email to