While it's of course possible to use htmlprag and sxml in order to
convert the xml or html output of the respective skribilo engines, I
wonder whether going straight from skribilo makeup to shtml or sxml might be
more efficient as sxml and shtml are sort of abstract syntax trees in
s-expressiobn syntax, as is skribilo ast. Would that be useful?

Klaus Schilling


_______________________________________________
Skribilo-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/skribilo-users

Reply via email to