Hi Klaus, Klaus Schilling <[email protected]> writes:
> While it's of course possible to use htmlprag and sxml in order to > convert the xml or html output of the respective skribilo engines, I > wonder whether going straight from skribilo makeup to shtml or sxml might be > more efficient as sxml and shtml are sort of abstract syntax trees in > s-expressiobn syntax, as is skribilo ast. Would that be useful? An SXML representation would be very close to Skribilo's AST as returned by the reader. It could be useful to Scheme/Lisp applications designed to operate on SXML and not on Skribilo's AST, of course; OTOH, I'm not sure there are so many of them, since the tags and structure of the SXML tree would be Skribilo-specific anyway. Did you have any particular application in mind? Thanks, Ludo'. _______________________________________________ Skribilo-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/skribilo-users
