Thanks for your help. I am really a beginner !
The trouble is also in the "Magnitude limit" field of the "options 
label" dialog in witch greater is the magnitude, more labels appear : if 
I set it to 0 for stars, I get more labels than if I set it to 3. Or 
magnitude 0 is greater than magnitude 3 !
This seems to me illogical.

Marceau

John Mahony a écrit :
>
> The label will depend on what catalog is active at the FOV you're 
> using (see
> preferences>catalog and objects parameters, stars1 or stars2 tab, then 
> note the
> "field min" and "field max" for each catalog).
>
> Generally you set these to user smaller catalogs of brighter stars 
> when viewing
> a wide field, and use deeper catalogs for narrower views. So the label 
> for a
> bright star in a wide field will show a common name or Beyer (greek 
> letter)
> designation (depending on your label options) from the "bright star 
> catalog",
> and then show a BD number from the Sky2000 catalog if you zoom in 
> some, and
> then show a Tycho number or whatever as you zoom in further.
>
> -John
>
>
> --- "marceau.guihard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> <mailto:marceau.guihard%40wanadoo.fr>> wrote:
>
> > Beginner in CdC 2.76c and in english expression.
> >
> > I am trying to get 'good' labels for stars (i.e. common names like
> > alpha - Aquilae or Altaïr if exist or cat-xxxx if not).
> > But I obtain HIP XXXXX since I loaded new catalogs.
> > How can I restore this?
> >
> > 1) Do I reload catalogs in good order (and what is the "good" order)?
> > Actuallly I have loaded all the cats availables in CdC.
> >
> > 2)Is it an option in registry (and witch)?
> > I saw that on W XP registry, I had two copies of options : one in
> > HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Astro_PC\Ciel and one another in
> > HKEY_USERS\Sxxxxxx\Software\Astro_PC\Ciel
> > In case of options in registry, do I modify the two copies?
> >
> > Thanks for help
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com <http://mail.yahoo.com>
>
>  


Reply via email to