Did you rebuild clementine after updating protobuf3? You should be on build 2 of clementine as that includes fixes for the new protobuf3 version.
It works fine on my end (I'm the clementine maintainer). Jeremy On Sun, Mar 10, 2024, 1:51 PM Ruben Carlo Benante via SlackBuilds-users < slackbuilds-users@slackbuilds.org> wrote: > Another thing that may or may not be related: > > The mp3 player Clementine has stoped working after upgrade. > > I've returned to grpc-1.48.4 and protobuf3-3.20.1, and after the downgrade > Clementine works fine again. > > Cordialmente, > Ruben > > -- > Dr. Beco > AI Researcher > > > > > ---- On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 13:54:41 -0300 *Ruben Carlo Benante <r...@beco.cc > <r...@beco.cc>>* wrote --- > > Hello, > > Is there an error in the version number? Or is it going from 3 to 25 and > keep growing further in the next versions? > > The following names are what it looked like in the past: > > * Packages/protobuf-2.6.1-x86_64-1_SBo.tgz > * Packages/protobuf3-3.17.3-x86_64-1_SBo.tgz > * Packages/protobuf3-3.18.1-x86_64-1_SBo.tgz > * Packages/protobuf3-3.19.1-x86_64-1_SBo.tgz > * Packages/protobuf3-3.19.3-x86_64-1_SBo.tgz > * Packages/protobuf3-3.19.4-x86_64-1_SBo.tgz > * Packages/protobuf3-3.20.0-x86_64-1_SBo.tgz > * Packages/protobuf3-3.20.1-x86_64-1_SBo.tgz > * Packages/protobuf3-25.3-x86_64-1_SBo.tgz > > > I'm afraid slackpkg or sbotools or sbopkg will complain if the next comes > with something like > > Packages/protobuf3-3.26.0-x86_64-1_SBo.tgz or something as previous format > > > Cordialmente, > Ruben > > -- > Dr. Beco > AI Researcher > > > > > ---- On Sat, 02 Mar 2024 18:10:31 -0300 *Giancarlo Dessì <sl...@giand.it > <sl...@giand.it>>* wrote --- > > Il 01/03/24 20:35, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo ha scritto: > > Hi > > > > i have just started to work on protobuf3 updates, pushing 2y of works > > by upstream since last update. > > > > However, there are 26 other scripts which depends on protobuf3, listed > > here (https://slackbuilds.org/advsearch.php?q=protobuf3&stype=revdep1) > > > > although we do have CI engine that could help us test whether the new > > update will break them or not, it won't help us testing the runtime > > issues. Therefore, i would like to ask for help by those who are using > > these 26 packages to see if by upgrading protobuf3 and rebuilding them > > will have any runtime issues or not. > > > > I will keep the protobuf3 updates for future public update (like 1-2 > > weeks delay) to give others more time to test. > > > > The protobuf3 update can be seen here > > https://git.slackbuilds.org/slackbuilds/log/?h=protobuf3-wip > > > > Big thanks in advance > > > At the moment I tested new protobuf3 in -current, it works for > protobuf-c/postgis and qgis > > After upgrade of protobuf3 the entire tree until qgis was broken, I had > to rebuild protobuf-c and then postgis and finally qgis because protobuf > is required as first level dependency also by qgis > > -- > > ********************************************************* > Giancarlo Dessì > https://www.giand.it > https://github.com/giandex > > Slackware Linux... because it works! > ********************************************************* > > _______________________________________________ > SlackBuilds-users mailing list > SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org > https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users > Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ > FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > SlackBuilds-users mailing list > SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org > https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users > Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ > FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/ > >
_______________________________________________ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/
