Personally I find SCons much much easier to work with, especially for porting work - is there any way SCons could be brought back alongside cmake perhaps?
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Rob Lanphier <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > As you may recall from December, we issued an RFP for improving our > build process: > https://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-11114 > > We got a couple of great proposals, and selected Kitware (makers of > CMake) for doing that work. > > Work has commenced now. Kitware convinced us that an important first > step is to move develop.py out of the way, and just have developers > invoke CMake in order to start a build. > > The really astute among you may have already noticed this work here: > http://svn.secondlife.com/trac/linden/browser/projects/2009/easybuild > > We'll have more details later about how that work is going by next week, > but I've been meaning to get this note out for a while. > > Rob > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges > -- “Lanie, I’m going to print more printers. Lots more printers. One for everyone. That’s worth going to jail for. That’s worth anything.” - Printcrime by Cory Doctrow Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
