On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Brad Kittenbrink (Brad Linden)<[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not sure I understand what your complaint is. There's nothing > blocking 1.22 viewers from logging in. Our policy for deprecating older > viewers is described here: > https://blogs.secondlife.com/community/technology/blog/2009/03/09/supported-viewer-versions > > Quite frankly if you're looking for "Some kind of clue" that a new > viewer is going to be released, then IMHO you should treat our release > of RC0 as that clue. We've been bad in previous releases by calling > things that weren't even close to releasable quality "RC" viewers, but > the 1.23 RC process is what we've been aiming for ever since we started > doing Release Candidates. We're sorry if you've gotten used to us > sucking, but this is one case where I'm glad to disappoint you. ;)
It really takes a brave man to claim 1.23RC4 and now production 1.24.4 "releasable quality". Is that why comments were closed after a few dozen or so on the blog post announcing the new viewer? _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
