Sorry, that should have been "can't link DLL's". On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 16:44 +0000, Dickson, Mike (ISS Software) wrote: > You can link DLL's. But generally a protocol over a socket (or other > transport) isn't enough to trigger a GPL violation. > > Mike > > On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 16:40 +0000, Tigro Spottystripes wrote: > > does it exempt them even if they're distributed in the same package? > > > > what about DLLs and such? > > Lawson English escreveu: > > > Argent Stonecutter wrote: > > > > > >> What license would be required for plugins? Would there be another > > >> exception carved out for them, or would they have to be GPL? > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > I thought (corrections welcome) that even the original GPL exempts > > > separate processes connected via IPC from the GPL requirements. > > > > > > If it didn't, than gridproxy would be in trouble, as would most > > > operating systems that used GNU applications at some point. > > > > > > > > > > > > Lawson > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > > > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev > > > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > > > privileges > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev > > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > > privileges > > > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
_______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
