Yes. Please add using Messages and support for StructuredData.

I'm fine with requiring Java 5.

Ralph

On Mar 6, 2010, at 5:48 AM, Ceki Gülcü wrote:

> 
> Hello all,
> 
> Here are the 4 items I'd like to address in SLF4J 2.0:
> 
> 1) Varargs for Logger methods
> http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31
> Require JDK 1.5 and remain binary compatible as explained in my comment #31 
> dated 2009-03-25
> 
> 2) logging exception if last argument, as exaplined by Joern in
> http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43
> 
> 3) Avoid bogus incompatibility warnings
> http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154
> 
> 4) fix http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=170 possibly with a nop 
> implementation of org.apache.log4j.NDC
> 
> Are there any other major items? Is everyone OK with requiring JDK  1.5 in 
> SLF4J 2.0?
> 
> --
> Ceki
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> slf4j-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-dev

_______________________________________________
slf4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-dev

Reply via email to